linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221214030430.3304151-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:04:30 +0800
From:   Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To:     paolo.valente@...aro.org, axboe@...nel.dk, jack@...e.cz
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yukuai3@...wei.com, yukuai1@...weicloud.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'

From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>

Our test report a uaf for 'bfqq->bic' in 5.10:

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in bfq_select_queue+0x378/0xa30

CPU: 6 PID: 2318352 Comm: fsstress Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.10.0-60.18.0.50.h602.kasan.eulerosv2r11.x86_64 #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58-20220320_160524-szxrtosci10000 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 bfq_select_queue+0x378/0xa30
 bfq_dispatch_request+0xe8/0x130
 blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0x62/0xb0
 __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x215/0x2a0
 blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x8f/0xd0
 __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x98/0x180
 __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0x22b/0x240
 blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xe3/0x190
 blk_mq_sched_insert_requests+0x107/0x200
 blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x26e/0x3c0
 blk_finish_plug+0x63/0x90
 __iomap_dio_rw+0x7b5/0x910
 iomap_dio_rw+0x36/0x80
 ext4_dio_read_iter+0x146/0x190 [ext4]
 ext4_file_read_iter+0x1e2/0x230 [ext4]
 new_sync_read+0x29f/0x400
 vfs_read+0x24e/0x2d0
 ksys_read+0xd5/0x1b0
 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6

Commit 3bc5e683c67d ("bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroups")
changes that move process to a new cgroup will allocate a new bfqq to
use, however, the old bfqq and new bfqq can point to the same bic:

1) Initial state, two process with io in the same cgroup.

Process 1       Process 2
 (BIC1)          (BIC2)
  |  Λ            |  Λ
  |  |            |  |
  V  |            V  |
  bfqq1           bfqq2

2) bfqq1 is merged to bfqq2.

Process 1       Process 2
 (BIC1)          (BIC2)
  |               |
   \-------------\|
                  V
  bfqq1           bfqq2(coop)

3) Process 1 exit, then issue new io(denoce IOA) from Process 2.

 (BIC2)
  |  Λ
  |  |
  V  |
  bfqq2(coop)

4) Before IOA is completed, move Process 2 to another cgroup and issue io.

Process 2
 (BIC2)
   Λ
   |\--------------\
   |                V
  bfqq2           bfqq3

Now that BIC2 points to bfqq3, while bfqq2 and bfqq3 both point to BIC2.
If all the requests are completed, and Process 2 exit, BIC2 will be
freed while there is no guarantee that bfqq2 will be freed before BIC2.

Fix the problem by clearing bfqq->bic while bfqq is detached from bic.

Fixes: 3bc5e683c67d ("bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroups")
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
---
Changes in v2:
 - Use a new solution as suggested by Jan.

 block/bfq-iosched.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index a72304c728fc..b111a7b8dca6 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -386,6 +386,12 @@ static void bfq_put_stable_ref(struct bfq_queue *bfqq);
 
 void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bool is_sync)
 {
+	struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bic->bfqq[is_sync];
+
+	/* Clear bic pointer if bfqq is detached from this bic */
+	if (old_bfqq && old_bfqq->bic == bic)
+		old_bfqq->bic = NULL;
+
 	/*
 	 * If bfqq != NULL, then a non-stable queue merge between
 	 * bic->bfqq and bfqq is happening here. This causes troubles
@@ -5311,7 +5317,6 @@ static void bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool is_sync)
 		unsigned long flags;
 
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&bfqd->lock, flags);
-		bfqq->bic = NULL;
 		bfq_exit_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq);
 		bic_set_bfqq(bic, NULL, is_sync);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd->lock, flags);
-- 
2.31.1