[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221214194056.161492-20-michael.roth@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:40:11 -0600
From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
To: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<mingo@...hat.com>, <jroedel@...e.de>, <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
<hpa@...or.com>, <ardb@...nel.org>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
<seanjc@...gle.com>, <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
<wanpengli@...cent.com>, <jmattson@...gle.com>, <luto@...nel.org>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <slp@...hat.com>,
<pgonda@...gle.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>, <rientjes@...gle.com>,
<dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>, <tobin@....com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<vbabka@...e.cz>, <kirill@...temov.name>, <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
<tony.luck@...el.com>, <marcorr@...gle.com>,
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
<alpergun@...gle.com>, <dgilbert@...hat.com>, <jarkko@...nel.org>,
<ashish.kalra@....com>, <harald@...fian.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v7 19/64] x86/traps: Define RMP violation #PF error code
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Bit 31 in the page fault-error bit will be set when processor encounters
an RMP violation.
While at it, use the BIT_ULL() macro.
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Signed-off by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@....com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h | 18 +++++++++++-------
arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h
index 10b1de500ab1..295be06f8db7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
#ifndef _ASM_X86_TRAP_PF_H
#define _ASM_X86_TRAP_PF_H
+#include <linux/bits.h> /* BIT() macro */
+
/*
* Page fault error code bits:
*
@@ -12,15 +14,17 @@
* bit 4 == 1: fault was an instruction fetch
* bit 5 == 1: protection keys block access
* bit 15 == 1: SGX MMU page-fault
+ * bit 31 == 1: fault was due to RMP violation
*/
enum x86_pf_error_code {
- X86_PF_PROT = 1 << 0,
- X86_PF_WRITE = 1 << 1,
- X86_PF_USER = 1 << 2,
- X86_PF_RSVD = 1 << 3,
- X86_PF_INSTR = 1 << 4,
- X86_PF_PK = 1 << 5,
- X86_PF_SGX = 1 << 15,
+ X86_PF_PROT = BIT(0),
+ X86_PF_WRITE = BIT(1),
+ X86_PF_USER = BIT(2),
+ X86_PF_RSVD = BIT(3),
+ X86_PF_INSTR = BIT(4),
+ X86_PF_PK = BIT(5),
+ X86_PF_SGX = BIT(15),
+ X86_PF_RMP = BIT(31),
};
#endif /* _ASM_X86_TRAP_PF_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 7b0d4ab894c8..f8193b99e9c8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -567,6 +567,7 @@ show_fault_oops(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, unsigned long ad
!(error_code & X86_PF_PROT) ? "not-present page" :
(error_code & X86_PF_RSVD) ? "reserved bit violation" :
(error_code & X86_PF_PK) ? "protection keys violation" :
+ (error_code & X86_PF_RMP) ? "RMP violation" :
"permissions violation");
if (!(error_code & X86_PF_USER) && user_mode(regs)) {
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists