lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 14 Dec 2022 21:09:43 -0800
From:   Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>
To:     Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable] mm: move folio_set_compound_order() to
 mm/internal.h

On 12/14/22 7:44 PM, Muchun Song wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Dec 14, 2022, at 05:20, Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>> folio_set_compound_order() is moved to an mm-internal location so external
>> folio users cannot misuse this function. Change the name of the function
>> to folio_set_order() and use WARN_ON_ONCE() rather than BUG_ON. Also,
>> handle the case if a non-large folio is passed and add clarifying comments
>> to the function.
>>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221207223731.32784-1-sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com/T/
>> Fixes: 9fd330582b2f ("mm: add folio dtor and order setter functions")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>
>> Suggested-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
>> Suggested-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
>> Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
>> Suggested-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Hi Muchun,

Does this review include the change from

+	if (!folio_test_large(folio)) {
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(order);
+		return;
+	}

to

if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_test_large(folio)))
		return;

discussed in in this thread?

Thanks,
Sidhartha Kumar
> 
> Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists