linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add base QDU1000/QRU1000 IDP DTs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2022 09:44:13 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add base QDU1000/QRU1000 IDP DTs

On 14/12/2022 19:59, Melody Olvera wrote:
> 
>>
>>> +			#clock-cells = <0>;
>>> +		};
>>> +
>>> +		sleep_clk: sleep-clk {
>>> +			compatible = "fixed-clock";
>>> +			clock-frequency = <32000>;
>>> +			#clock-cells = <0>;
>>> +		};
>>> +
>>> +		pcie_0_pipe_clk: pcie-0-pipe-clk {
>> Afaict these clocks are not referenced anywhere, so please skip them.
> 
> Yes, so I included them to be consistent with the bindings. They will be needed later;
> should I still remove?
> 

If they are not referenced anywhere, how is it consistent with bindings?
Where do the bindings require defining such nodes?

Best regards,
Krzysztof