| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20221215091739.iuukh5xkoycei7ro@sgarzare-redhat>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 10:17:39 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com>,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@...edance.com>,
Krasnov Arseniy <oxffffaa@...il.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8] virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with
sk_buff
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 04:04:53AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 09:47:57AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 04:36:44AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>> > This commit changes virtio/vsock to use sk_buff instead of
>> > virtio_vsock_pkt. Beyond better conforming to other net code, using
>> > sk_buff allows vsock to use sk_buff-dependent features in the future
>> > (such as sockmap) and improves throughput.
>> >
>> > This patch introduces the following performance changes:
>> >
>> > Tool/Config: uperf w/ 64 threads, SOCK_STREAM
>> > Test Runs: 5, mean of results
>> > Before: commit 95ec6bce2a0b ("Merge branch 'net-ipa-more-endpoints'")
>> >
>> > Test: 64KB, g2h
>> > Before: 21.63 Gb/s
>> > After: 25.59 Gb/s (+18%)
>> >
>> > Test: 16B, g2h
>> > Before: 11.86 Mb/s
>> > After: 17.41 Mb/s (+46%)
>> >
>> > Test: 64KB, h2g
>> > Before: 2.15 Gb/s
>> > After: 3.6 Gb/s (+67%)
>> >
>> > Test: 16B, h2g
>> > Before: 14.38 Mb/s
>> > After: 18.43 Mb/s (+28%)
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
>> > ---
>> >
>> > Testing: passed vsock_test h2g and g2h
>> > Note2: net-next is closed, but sending out now in case more comments
>> > roll in, as discussed here:
>> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y34SoH1nFTXXLWbK@bullseye/
>> >
>> > Changes in v8:
>> > - vhost/vsock: remove unused enum
>> > - vhost/vsock: use spin_lock_bh() instead of spin_lock()
>> > - vsock/loopback: use __skb_dequeue instead of skb_dequeue
>> >
>> > Changes in v7:
>> > - use skb_queue_empty() instead of skb_queue_empty_lockless()
>> >
>> > Changes in v6:
>> > - use skb->cb instead of skb->_skb_refdst
>> > - use lock-free __skb_queue_purge for rx_queue when rx_lock held
>> >
>> > Changes in v5:
>> > - last_skb instead of skb: last_hdr->len = cpu_to_le32(last_skb->len)
>> >
>> > Changes in v4:
>> > - vdso/bits.h -> linux/bits.h
>> > - add virtio_vsock_alloc_skb() helper
>> > - virtio/vsock: rename buf_len -> total_len
>> > - update last_hdr->len
>> > - fix build_skb() for vsockmon (tested)
>> > - add queue helpers
>> > - use spin_{unlock/lock}_bh() instead of spin_lock()/spin_unlock()
>> > - note: I only ran a few g2h tests to check that this change
>> > had no perf impact. The above data is still from patch
>> > v3.
>> >
>> > Changes in v3:
>> > - fix seqpacket bug
>> > - use zero in vhost_add_used(..., 0) device doesn't write to buffer
>> > - use xmas tree style declarations
>> > - vsock_hdr() -> virtio_vsock_hdr() and other include file style fixes
>> > - no skb merging
>> > - save space by not using vsock_metadata
>> > - use _skb_refdst instead of skb buffer space for flags
>> > - use skb_pull() to keep track of read bytes instead of using an an
>> > extra variable 'off' in the skb buffer space
>> > - remove unnecessary sk_allocation assignment
>> > - do not zero hdr needlessly
>> > - introduce virtio_transport_skb_len() because skb->len changes now
>> > - use spin_lock() directly on queue lock instead of sk_buff_head helpers
>> > which use spin_lock_irqsave() (e.g., skb_dequeue)
>> > - do not reduce buffer size to be page size divisible
>> > - Note: the biggest performance change came from loosening the spinlock
>> > variation and not reducing the buffer size.
>> >
>> > Changes in v2:
>> > - Use alloc_skb() directly instead of sock_alloc_send_pskb() to minimize
>> > uAPI changes.
>> > - Do not marshal errors to -ENOMEM for non-virtio implementations.
>> > - No longer a part of the original series
>> > - Some code cleanup and refactoring
>> > - Include performance stats
>> >
>> > drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 213 +++++-------
>> > include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 126 +++++--
>> > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 149 +++------
>> > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 422 +++++++++++++-----------
>> > net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c | 51 +--
>> > 5 files changed, 495 insertions(+), 466 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>> > index 5703775af129..ee0a00432cb1 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>> > @@ -51,8 +51,7 @@ struct vhost_vsock {
>> > struct hlist_node hash;
>> >
>> > struct vhost_work send_pkt_work;
>> > - spinlock_t send_pkt_list_lock;
>> > - struct list_head send_pkt_list; /* host->guest pending packets */
>> > + struct sk_buff_head send_pkt_queue; /* host->guest pending packets */
>> >
>> > atomic_t queued_replies;
>> >
>> > @@ -108,40 +107,33 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock
>> > *vsock,
>> > vhost_disable_notify(&vsock->dev, vq);
>> >
>> > do {
>> > - struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
>> > + struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
>> > + size_t iov_len, payload_len;
>> > struct iov_iter iov_iter;
>> > + u32 flags_to_restore = 0;
>> > + struct sk_buff *skb;
>> > unsigned out, in;
>> > size_t nbytes;
>> > - size_t iov_len, payload_len;
>> > int head;
>> > - u32 flags_to_restore = 0;
>> >
>> > - spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
>> > - if (list_empty(&vsock->send_pkt_list)) {
>> > - spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_list_lock);
>> > + spin_lock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_queue.lock);
>> > + skb = __skb_dequeue(&vsock->send_pkt_queue);
>> > + spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->send_pkt_queue.lock);
>>
>> Sorry for coming late, but I just commented in Paolo's reply.
>> Here I think we can directly use the new virtio_vsock_skb_dequeue().
>
>Yea, pretty late.
>And using that will prevent me from merging this since it's not in my tree yet.
>We can do a cleanup patch on top.
Yep, sure!
Functionally nothing changes, so it's fine with a patch on top.
So, for this patch:
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Thanks,
Stefano
Powered by blists - more mailing lists