[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2541e0d3d4fb38af995e8bd91a34986d@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 11:51:41 +0100
From: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
cohuck@...hat.com, mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
fiuczy@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] s390/vfio_ap: use TAPQ to verify reset in progress
completes
On 2022-12-13 16:44, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> To eliminate the repeated calls to the PQAP(ZAPQ) function to verify
> that
> a reset in progress completed successfully and ensure that error
> response
> codes get appropriately logged, let's call the apq_reset_check()
> function
> when the ZAPQ response code indicates that a reset that is already in
> progress.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index a5530a46cf31..5bf2d93ae8af 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
> static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(struct ap_queue_table *qtable);
> static struct vfio_ap_queue *vfio_ap_find_queue(int apqn);
> static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_ap_matrix_dev_ops;
> -static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q, unsigned
> int retry);
> +static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q);
>
> /**
> * get_update_locks_for_kvm: Acquire the locks required to dynamically
> update a
> @@ -1632,8 +1632,7 @@ static int apq_reset_check(struct vfio_ap_queue
> *q)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q,
> - unsigned int retry)
> +static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
> {
> struct ap_queue_status status;
> int ret;
> @@ -1648,12 +1647,15 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(struct
> vfio_ap_queue *q,
> ret = 0;
> break;
> case AP_RESPONSE_RESET_IN_PROGRESS:
> - if (retry--) {
> - msleep(20);
> - goto retry_zapq;
> - }
> - ret = -EBUSY;
> - break;
> + /*
> + * There is a reset issued by another process in progress. Let's
> wait
> + * for that to complete. Since we have no idea whether it was a RAPQ
> or
> + * ZAPQ, then if it completes successfully, let's issue the ZAPQ.
> + */
> + ret = apq_reset_check(q);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> + goto retry_zapq;
> case AP_RESPONSE_Q_NOT_AVAIL:
> case AP_RESPONSE_DECONFIGURED:
> case AP_RESPONSE_CHECKSTOPPED:
> @@ -1688,7 +1690,7 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(struct
> ap_queue_table *qtable)
> struct vfio_ap_queue *q;
>
> hash_for_each(qtable->queues, loop_cursor, q, mdev_qnode) {
> - ret = vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(q, 1);
> + ret = vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(q);
> /*
> * Regardless whether a queue turns out to be busy, or
> * is not operational, we need to continue resetting
> @@ -1931,7 +1933,7 @@ void vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue(struct ap_device
> *apdev)
> }
> }
>
> - vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(q, 1);
> + vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(q);
> dev_set_drvdata(&apdev->device, NULL);
> kfree(q);
> release_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev);
Reviewed-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists