[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b0f29738b919e2705d770017f2f1eb0542c2fad4.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 06:10:04 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>, jarkko@...nel.org
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, paul@...l-moore.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
serge@...lyn.com, pvorel@...e.cz, noodles@...com, tiwai@...e.de,
kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
erpalmer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, coxu@...hat.com,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] KEYS: X.509: Parse Basic Constraints for CA
> diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_parser.h b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_parser.h
> index a299c9c56f40..7c5c0ad1c22e 100644
> --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_parser.h
> +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_parser.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct x509_certificate {
> bool self_signed; /* T if self-signed (check unsupported_sig too) */
> bool unsupported_sig; /* T if signature uses unsupported crypto */
> bool blacklisted;
> + bool root_ca; /* T if basic constraints CA is set */
> };
The variable "root_ca" should probably be renamed to just "ca", right?
--
thanks,
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists