linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ata:libata-eh:Cleanup ata_scsi_cmd_error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d991d4fd-3b5f-f0ef-5c96-2352a08e1262@opensource.wdc.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2022 20:34:09 +0900
From:   Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To:     Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>,
        Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@...wei.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com, linfeilong@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ata:libata-eh:Cleanup ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler

On 12/15/22 20:30, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello!
> 
>   The subject should really look like "ata: libata-eh: Cleanup
> ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler()"...
> 
> On 12/15/22 1:57 PM, Wenchao Hao wrote:
> 
>> If ap->ops->error_handler is NULL, just return.
>>
>> V2:
>> - Check ap->ops->error_handler without taking the spin lock
> 
>    This normally belongs under ---...

I should read all emails before replying. I commented exactly the same :)

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
>> index 34303ce67c14..c445c272e77f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> [...]
>> @@ -584,62 +589,57 @@ void ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct ata_port *ap,
>>  	 * timed out iff its associated qc is active and not failed.
>>  	 */
>>  	spin_lock_irqsave(ap->lock, flags);
>> -	if (ap->ops->error_handler) {
>> -		struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, *tmp;
>> -		int nr_timedout = 0;
>> -
>> -		/* This must occur under the ap->lock as we don't want
>> -		   a polled recovery to race the real interrupt handler
>> -
>> -		   The lost_interrupt handler checks for any completed but
>> -		   non-notified command and completes much like an IRQ handler.
>>  
>> -		   We then fall into the error recovery code which will treat
>> -		   this as if normal completion won the race */
>> -
>> -		if (ap->ops->lost_interrupt)
>> -			ap->ops->lost_interrupt(ap);
>> +	/* This must occur under the ap->lock as we don't want
> 
>    The multi-line comments should start with /* on its own line...
> 
>> +	 * a polled recovery to race the real interrupt handler
>> +	 *
>> +	 * The lost_interrupt handler checks for any completed but
>> +	 * non-notified command and completes much like an IRQ handler.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * We then fall into the error recovery code which will treat
>> +	 * this as if normal completion won the race
>> +	 */
>> +	if (ap->ops->lost_interrupt)
>> +		ap->ops->lost_interrupt(ap);
>>  
>> -		list_for_each_entry_safe(scmd, tmp, eh_work_q, eh_entry) {
>> -			struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(scmd, tmp, eh_work_q, eh_entry) {
>> +		struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
>>  
>> -			ata_qc_for_each_raw(ap, qc, i) {
>> -				if (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE &&
>> -				    qc->scsicmd == scmd)
>> -					break;
>> -			}
>> +		ata_qc_for_each_raw(ap, qc, i) {
>> +			if (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE &&
>> +			    qc->scsicmd == scmd)
>> +				break;
>> +		}
>>  
>> -			if (i < ATA_MAX_QUEUE) {
>> -				/* the scmd has an associated qc */
>> -				if (!(qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_FAILED)) {
>> -					/* which hasn't failed yet, timeout */
>> -					qc->err_mask |= AC_ERR_TIMEOUT;
>> -					qc->flags |= ATA_QCFLAG_FAILED;
>> -					nr_timedout++;
>> -				}
>> -			} else {
>> -				/* Normal completion occurred after
>> -				 * SCSI timeout but before this point.
>> -				 * Successfully complete it.
>> -				 */
>> -				scmd->retries = scmd->allowed;
>> -				scsi_eh_finish_cmd(scmd, &ap->eh_done_q);
>> +		if (i < ATA_MAX_QUEUE) {
>> +			/* the scmd has an associated qc */
>> +			if (!(qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_FAILED)) {
>> +				/* which hasn't failed yet, timeout */
>> +				qc->err_mask |= AC_ERR_TIMEOUT;
>> +				qc->flags |= ATA_QCFLAG_FAILED;
>> +				nr_timedout++;
>>  			}
>> +		} else {
>> +			/* Normal completion occurred after
> 
>    Here as well...
> 
>> +			 * SCSI timeout but before this point.
>> +			 * Successfully complete it.
>> +			 */
>> +			scmd->retries = scmd->allowed;
>> +			scsi_eh_finish_cmd(scmd, &ap->eh_done_q);
>>  		}
>> +	}
>>  
>> -		/* If we have timed out qcs.  They belong to EH from
>> -		 * this point but the state of the controller is
>> -		 * unknown.  Freeze the port to make sure the IRQ
>> -		 * handler doesn't diddle with those qcs.  This must
>> -		 * be done atomically w.r.t. setting QCFLAG_FAILED.
>> -		 */
>> -		if (nr_timedout)
>> -			__ata_port_freeze(ap);
>> -
>> +	/* If we have timed out qcs.  They belong to EH from
> 
>    And here...
> 
> [...]
> 
> MBR, Sergey

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research