[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zgboddb7.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 06:08:44 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, axboe@...a.com, sagi@...mberg.me,
kbusch@...nel.org
Cc: linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs, nvme: add a feature and quirk policy document
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> writes:
> This adds a document about what specification features are supported by
> the Linux NVMe driver, and what qualifies for a quirk if an implementation
> has problems following the specification.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
> Documentation/process/index.rst | 1 +
> .../process/nvme-feature-and-quirk-policy.rst | 77 +++++++++++++++++++
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/process/nvme-feature-and-quirk-policy.rst
The document looks fine, but I do wonder if it wouldn't be better placed
with the other maintainer entries in Documentation/maintainer?
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists