lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5p8V1jkuE6MguRM@leoy-yangtze.lan>
Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2022 09:45:59 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
        Adrián Herrera Arcila 
        <adrian.herrera@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, songliubraving@...com,
        peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, mark.rutland@....com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf stat: fix unexpected delay behaviour

On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 02:35:01PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:

[...]

> > I don't know anything for eBPF counter, so this is why I am still a bit
> > puzzle which way is right to do (bind vs separate eBPF counters).  But
> > I personally prefer to let eBPF counter to respect delay, so it's fine
> > for me to apply Namhyung's patch.
> 
> "I'm fine" can be read as an Acked-by, right? :-)

Yes, have sent my Reviewed tag on Namhyung's patch.

Thanks,
Leo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ