linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf stat: fix unexpected delay behaviour

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2022 09:45:59 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
        Adrián Herrera Arcila 
        <adrian.herrera@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, songliubraving@...com,
        peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, mark.rutland@....com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf stat: fix unexpected delay behaviour

On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 02:35:01PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:

[...]

> > I don't know anything for eBPF counter, so this is why I am still a bit
> > puzzle which way is right to do (bind vs separate eBPF counters).  But
> > I personally prefer to let eBPF counter to respect delay, so it's fine
> > for me to apply Namhyung's patch.
> 
> "I'm fine" can be read as an Acked-by, right? :-)

Yes, have sent my Reviewed tag on Namhyung's patch.

Thanks,
Leo