[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5p8V1jkuE6MguRM@leoy-yangtze.lan>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 09:45:59 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Adrián Herrera Arcila
<adrian.herrera@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, songliubraving@...com,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf stat: fix unexpected delay behaviour
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 02:35:01PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
[...]
> > I don't know anything for eBPF counter, so this is why I am still a bit
> > puzzle which way is right to do (bind vs separate eBPF counters). But
> > I personally prefer to let eBPF counter to respect delay, so it's fine
> > for me to apply Namhyung's patch.
>
> "I'm fine" can be read as an Acked-by, right? :-)
Yes, have sent my Reviewed tag on Namhyung's patch.
Thanks,
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists