linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add SM6115 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3134ba66-27bb-7015-8988-6c8dec046b0f@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2022 17:14:17 +0200
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Adam Skladowski <a39.skl@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@...cinc.com>,
        Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add SM6115 support

On 15/12/2022 17:10, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 30/10/2022 11:42, Iskren Chernev wrote:
>> From: Adam Skladowski <a39.skl@...il.com>
>>
>> Add the Qualcomm SM6115 platform to the list of compatible,
>> this target uses MMU500 for both APSS and GPU.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adam Skladowski <a39.skl@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@...il.com>
> 
> This needs to rebased on linux-next (or 6.2-rc1 once it's out).

To add on top of that. linux-next has the following comment:

/*
  * Do not add any more qcom,SOC-smmu-500 entries to this list, unless 
they need
  * special handling and can not be covered by the qcom,smmu-500 entry.
  */

So, hopefully you can skip this patch completely by depending on the 
generic "qcom,smmu-500" compatible.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry