linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: Make rproc_get_by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANLsYkwPvkr8bujPsRD+4g2Lrwiu5dB7-k-biXaQRMm70ANBVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2022 08:57:37 -0700
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>, Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>,
        Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>,
        "Bajjuri, Praneeth" <praneeth@...com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, a-bhatia1@...com,
        j-luthra@...com
Cc:     linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ben.levinsky@...inx.com, andersson@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: Make rproc_get_by_phandle() work for clusters

People at TI - please test this patch for AM3352.  Theoretically
things should be fine but I would certainly appreciate a T-B from
someone at TI.

Thanks,
Mathieu

On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 at 15:16, Mathieu Poirier
<mathieu.poirier@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Multi-cluster remoteproc designs typically have the following DT
> declaration:
>
>         remoteproc_cluster {
>                 compatible = "soc,remoteproc-cluster";
>
>                 core0: core0 {
>                         compatible = "soc,remoteproc-core"
>                         memory-region;
>                         sram;
>                 };
>
>                 core1: core1 {
>                         compatible = "soc,remoteproc-core"
>                         memory-region;
>                         sram;
>                 }
>         };
>
> A driver exists for the cluster rather than the individual cores
> themselves so that operation mode and HW specific configurations
> applicable to the cluster can be made.
>
> Because the driver exists at the cluster level and not the individual
> core level, function rproc_get_by_phandle() fails to return the
> remoteproc associated with the phandled it is called for.
>
> This patch enhances rproc_get_by_phandle() by looking for the cluster's
> driver when the driver for the immediate remoteproc's parent is not
> found.
>
> Reported-by: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@...inx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 1cd4815a6dd1..91f82886add9 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>  #include <linux/idr.h>
>  #include <linux/elf.h>
>  #include <linux/crc32.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  #include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
>  #include <linux/virtio_ids.h>
>  #include <linux/virtio_ring.h>
> @@ -2110,7 +2111,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_detach);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>  struct rproc *rproc_get_by_phandle(phandle phandle)
>  {
> +       struct platform_device *cluster_pdev;
>         struct rproc *rproc = NULL, *r;
> +       struct device_driver *driver;
>         struct device_node *np;
>
>         np = of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle);
> @@ -2121,7 +2124,30 @@ struct rproc *rproc_get_by_phandle(phandle phandle)
>         list_for_each_entry_rcu(r, &rproc_list, node) {
>                 if (r->dev.parent && device_match_of_node(r->dev.parent, np)) {
>                         /* prevent underlying implementation from being removed */
> -                       if (!try_module_get(r->dev.parent->driver->owner)) {
> +
> +                       /*
> +                        * If the remoteproc's parent has a driver, the
> +                        * remoteproc is not part of a cluster and we can use
> +                        * that driver.
> +                        */
> +                       driver = r->dev.parent->driver;
> +
> +                       /*
> +                        * If the remoteproc's parent does not have a driver,
> +                        * look for the driver associated with the cluster.
> +                        */
> +                       if (!driver) {
> +                               cluster_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np->parent);
> +                               if (!cluster_pdev) {
> +                                       dev_err(&r->dev, "can't get parent\n");
> +                                       break;
> +                               }
> +
> +                               driver = cluster_pdev->dev.driver;
> +                               put_device(&cluster_pdev->dev);
> +                       }
> +
> +                       if (!try_module_get(driver->owner)) {
>                                 dev_err(&r->dev, "can't get owner\n");
>                                 break;
>                         }
> --
> 2.25.1
>