[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5tGzjgcAWPqdFNE@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 16:09:50 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: jerome Neanne <jneanne@...libre.com>
Cc: Wadim Egorov <W.Egorov@...tec.de>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, "nm@...com" <nm@...com>,
"kristo@...nel.org" <kristo@...nel.org>,
"dmitry.torokhov@...il.com" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"lee@...nel.org" <lee@...nel.org>,
"tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
"vigneshr@...com" <vigneshr@...com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"geert+renesas@...der.be" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org" <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
"marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com" <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>,
"vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"biju.das.jz@...renesas.com" <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"jeff@...undy.com" <jeff@...undy.com>, "afd@...com" <afd@...com>,
"khilman@...libre.com" <khilman@...libre.com>,
"narmstrong@...libre.com" <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
"msp@...libre.com" <msp@...libre.com>,
"j-keerthy@...com" <j-keerthy@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] DONOTMERGE: arm64: dts: ti: Add TI TPS65219 PMIC
support for AM642 SK board.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 04:51:40PM +0100, jerome Neanne wrote:
> On 15/12/2022 16:09, Wadim Egorov wrote:
> > I am testing your PMIC patches on a AM62 based board with a similar setup and
> > running into the following error
> > VDDSHV5_SDIO: bypassed regulator has no supply!
> > VDDSHV5_SDIO: will resolve supply early: ldo1
> > VDDSHV5_SDIO: supplied by regulator-dummy
> > VDDSHV5_SDIO: failed to get the current voltage: -EINVAL
> > Have you noticed problems with LDO1 and bypass mode?
> I did not noticed this on am642 board but IIRC this rail was not used. I
> heard about similar issue reported to me by Nishanth M with a fix proposal
> here:
> https://gist.github.com/nmenon/e4dd6ef6afe31bc9750fa6cbee8d3e25
That proposal looks really non-idiomatic and quite unusual, if there's a
fixed voltage supply to the LDO I'd expect to see it modeled as a fixed
voltage regulator. I'm not sure what the use of bypass here is trying
to accomplish TBH.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists