linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add UFS nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0c53ff07-8cf4-3e80-97fc-67dd2f2612f9@mint.lgbt>
Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2022 13:56:42 -0300
From:   Lux Aliaga <they@...t.lgbt>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add UFS nodes

On 15/12/2022 13:18, Konrad Dybcio wrote:

> On 15.12.2022 17:12, Lux Aliaga wrote:
>> Adds a UFS host controller node and its corresponding PHY to
>> the sm6125 platform.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lux Aliaga <they@...t.lgbt>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
>> index 7e25a4f85594..6d4534c7a2fe 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
>> @@ -508,6 +508,72 @@ sdhc_2: mmc@...4000 {
>>   			status = "disabled";
>>   		};
>>   
>> +		ufs_mem_hc: ufs@...4000 {
>> +			compatible = "qcom,sm6125-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc", "jedec,ufs-2.0";
>> +			reg = <0x04804000 0x3000>, <0x04810000 0x8000>;
>> +			reg-names = "std", "ice";
>> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 356 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> +			phys = <&ufs_mem_phy_lanes>;
>> +			phy-names = "ufsphy";
>> +			lanes-per-direction = <1>;
>> +			#reset-cells = <1>;
>> +			resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_BCR>;
>> +			reset-names = "rst";
>> +
>> +			clock-names = "core_clk",
>> +				"bus_aggr_clk",
>> +				"iface_clk",
>> +				"core_clk_unipro",
>> +				"ref_clk",
>> +				"tx_lane0_sync_clk",
>> +				"rx_lane0_sync_clk",
>> +				"ice_core_clk";
>> +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
>> +				<&gcc GCC_SYS_NOC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
>> +				<&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AHB_CLK>,
>> +				<&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_UNIPRO_CORE_CLK>,
>> +				<&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>,
>> +				<&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_TX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
>> +				<&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
>> +				<&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_ICE_CORE_CLK>;
>> +			freq-table-hz = <50000000 240000000>,
>> +				<0 0>,
>> +				<0 0>,
>> +				<37500000 150000000>,
>> +				<0 0>,
>> +				<0 0>,
>> +				<0 0>,
>> +				<75000000 300000000>;
> The indentation is wrong. Make sure your tab size is set to 8
> and all the <> entries align with the first one.
Should I do this with clocks and clock-names too?

-- 
Lux Aliaga
https://nixgoat.me/