linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] scsi:donot skip lun if inquiry returns PQ=1 for all hosts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y5waet8RoXKQHDR7@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2022 23:12:58 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@...wei.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>, Chris Leech <cleech@...hat.com>,
        open-iscsi@...glegroups.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com,
        linfeilong@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] scsi:donot skip lun if inquiry returns PQ=1 for all
 hosts

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:09:31PM +0800, Wenchao Hao wrote:
> In my opinion, if the addressed lun still response the
> inquiry and other commands, we should not skip it,
> maybe let the scsi drivers like sd/st/sg to determine
> how to handle this lun accordint to the PQ value.
> 
> As discussed in following mail, another drivers would
> be broken too.

So why do you force a specific behavior for iSCSI?