linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] ARM: dts: at91: sam9x60: Fix the label numbering for the flexcom functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7354bda9-fb01-7812-eb83-d23ddb3f4ce8@microchip.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:32:11 +0000
From:   <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>
To:     <Durai.ManickamKR@...rochip.com>, <Hari.PrasathGE@...rochip.com>,
        <Balamanikandan.Gunasundar@...rochip.com>,
        <Manikandan.M@...rochip.com>, <Varshini.Rajendran@...rochip.com>,
        <Dharma.B@...rochip.com>, <Cristian.Birsan@...rochip.com>,
        <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <arnd@...db.de>, <olof@...om.net>, <soc@...nel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <Kavyasree.Kotagiri@...rochip.com>,
        <Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <andrew@...n.ch>, <michael@...le.cc>, <Jerry.Ray@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] ARM: dts: at91: sam9x60: Fix the label numbering
 for the flexcom functions

Hi, Durai,

On 13.12.2022 14:06, Durai Manickam KR wrote:
> From: Manikandan Muralidharan <manikandan.m@...rochip.com>
> 
> Fixed the label numbering of the flexcom functions so that all
> 13 flexcom functions of sam9x60 are in the following order when the missing
> flexcom functions are added:
> 
> flx0: uart0, spi0, i2c0
> flx1: uart1, spi1, i2c1
> flx2: uart2, spi2, i2c2
> flx3: uart3, spi3, i2c3
> flx4: uart4, spi4, i2c4
> flx5: uart5, spi5, i2c5
> flx6: uart6, i2c6
> flx7: uart7, i2c7
> flx8: uart8, i2c8
> flx9: uart9, i2c9
> flx10: uart10, i2c10
> flx11: uart11, i2c11
> flx12: uart12, i2c12
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manikandan Muralidharan <manikandan.m@...rochip.com>

You SoB should go here.

> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sam9x60ek.dts | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sam9x60ek.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sam9x60ek.dts
> index d929c1ba5789..cf5d786531f2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sam9x60ek.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sam9x60ek.dts
> @@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ / {
>  
>  	aliases {
>  		i2c0 = &i2c0;
> -		i2c1 = &i2c1;
> -		serial1 = &uart1;
> +		i2c1 = &i2c6;
> +		serial1 = &uart5;
>  	};
>  
>  	chosen {
> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ &flx4 {
>  	atmel,flexcom-mode = <ATMEL_FLEXCOM_MODE_SPI>;
>  	status = "disabled";
>  
> -	spi0: spi@400 {
> +	spi4: spi@400 {
>  		compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-spi", "atmel,at91rm9200-spi";
>  		reg = <0x400 0x200>;
>  		interrupts = <13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>;
> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ &flx5 {
>  	atmel,flexcom-mode = <ATMEL_FLEXCOM_MODE_USART>;
>  	status = "okay";
>  
> -	uart1: serial@200 {
> +	uart5: serial@200 {
>  		compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-dbgu", "microchip,sam9x60-usart", "atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu", "atmel,at91sam9260-usart";
>  		reg = <0x200 0x200>;
>  		atmel,usart-mode = <AT91_USART_MODE_SERIAL>;
> @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ &flx6 {
>  	atmel,flexcom-mode = <ATMEL_FLEXCOM_MODE_TWI>;
>  	status = "okay";
>  
> -	i2c1: i2c@600 {
> +	i2c6: i2c@600 {
>  		compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-i2c";
>  		reg = <0x600 0x200>;
>  		interrupts = <9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>;
> @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ AT91_PIOA 13 AT91_PERIPH_A AT91_PINCTRL_NONE
>  				 AT91_PIOA 14 AT91_PERIPH_A AT91_PINCTRL_NONE>;
>  		};
>  
> -		pinctrl_flx5_default: flx_uart {
> +		pinctrl_flx5_default: flx5_uart {
>  			atmel,pins =
>  				<AT91_PIOA 7 AT91_PERIPH_C AT91_PINCTRL_NONE
>  				 AT91_PIOA 8 AT91_PERIPH_B AT91_PINCTRL_NONE