linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: libsas: Directly kick-off EH when ATA device fell off

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ddc08902-cbf1-52c3-e7b0-8c130d4bf58c@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Dec 2022 17:53:18 +0800
From:   yangxingui <yangxingui@...wei.com>
To:     Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>, <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
CC:     <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linuxarm@...wei.com>, <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>,
        <kangfenglong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: libsas: Directly kick-off EH when ATA device fell
 off



On 2022/12/16 17:29, Jason Yan wrote:
> On 2022/12/16 11:29, Xingui Yang wrote:
>> If the ATA device fell off, call sas_ata_device_link_abort() directly and
>> mark all outstanding QCs as failed and kick-off EH Immediately. This 
>> avoids
>> having to wait for block layer timeouts.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c | 5 +++++
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c 
>> b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
>> index d5bc1314c341..bd22741daa99 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
>> @@ -362,6 +362,11 @@ static void sas_destruct_ports(struct 
>> asd_sas_port *port)
>>   void sas_unregister_dev(struct asd_sas_port *port, struct 
>> domain_device *dev)
>>   {
>> +    if (test_bit(SAS_DEV_GONE, &dev->state) &&
>> +        (dev->dev_type == SAS_SATA_DEV ||
>> +        (dev->tproto & SAS_PROTOCOL_STP)))
> 
> dev_is_sata() would be better here.

ok, Thanks for your advice.

Thanks,
Xingui
> 
> Thanks,
> Jason
> 
>> +        sas_ata_device_link_abort(dev, false);
>> +
>>       if (!test_bit(SAS_DEV_DESTROY, &dev->state) &&
>>           !list_empty(&dev->disco_list_node)) {
>>           /* this rphy never saw sas_rphy_add */
>>
> .