[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221216065739.30511197@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 06:57:39 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@...wei.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>, <linfeilong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cma:tracing: Print alloc result in
trace_cma_alloc_finish
On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 19:47:59 +0800
Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@...wei.com> wrote:
> On 2022/12/8 22:21, Wenchao Hao wrote:
> > The result of allocation is not printed in trace_cma_alloc_finish
> > now, while it's important to do it so we can set filters to catch
> > specific error on allocation or trigger some operations on specific
> > error.
> >
> > Although we have printed the result in log, but the log is
> > conditional and could not be filtered by tracing event.
> >
> > What's more, it introduce little overhead to print this result.
> > The result of allocation is named as errorno in trace.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@...wei.com>
> > ---
>
> pinging
>From a tracing point of view, I see nothing wrong with it.
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
But I believe Andrew needs to take it.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists