[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1114488b-7e73-6086-2f76-cb71ef6056f6@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 14:22:02 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
Cc: Phong LE <ple@...libre.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
list@...ndingux.net, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: display: bridge: it66121: Add
compatible string for IT6610
On 16/12/2022 13:21, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> Le vendredi 16 décembre 2022 à 12:21 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski a
> écrit :
>> On 16/12/2022 11:46, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>>
>>>>> properties:
>>>>> compatible:
>>>>> - const: ite,it66121
>>>>> + enum:
>>>>> + - ite,it66121
>>>>> + - ite,it6610
>>
>> These should be ordered alphabetically. What's with the tendency of
>> adding always to the end?
>
> I'm too used to the "inverse christmas tree" sort :)
Since these are not variables and they will not get shorter, any
christmas tree sorting here is the same conflict-prone as adding to the end.
>
> I can send a quickfix patch if you really want alphabetical order.
No, no need.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists