linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] riscv: avoid enabling vectorized code generation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <mhng-d601613f-1c73-48e0-bb06-7f87acd60cfa@palmer-ri-x1c9a>
Date:   Fri, 16 Dec 2022 11:54:39 -0800 (PST)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To:     ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
        nathan@...nel.org
CC:     abdulras@...gle.com, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:     Re: [PATCH] riscv: avoid enabling vectorized code generation

On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 11:45:21 PST (-0800), ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk wrote:
>
>
> On 2022-12-16 18:50, Saleem Abdulrasool wrote:
>> The compiler is free to generate vectorized operations for zero'ing
>> memory.  The kernel does not use the vector unit on RISCV, similar to
>> architectures such as x86 where we use `-mno-mmx` et al to prevent the
>> implicit vectorization.  Perform a similar check for
>> `-mno-implicit-float` to avoid this on RISC-V targets.
>
> I'm not sure if we should be emitting either of the vector or floating
> point instrucitons in the kernel without explicitly marking the section
> of code which is using them such as specific accelerator blocks.

Yep, we can't let the compiler just blindly enable V or F/D.  V would 
very much break things as we have no support, but even when that's in 
we'll we at roughly the same spot as F/D are now where we need to handle 
the lazy save/restore bits.

This looks like an LLVM-only option, I see at least some handling here

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/a72883b7612f5c00b592da85ed2f1fd81258cc08/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp#L2098

but I don't really know LLVM enough to understand if there's some 
default for `-mimplicit-float` and I can't find anything in the docs.  
If it can be turned on by default and that results in F/D/V instructions 
then we'll need to explicitly turn it off, and that would need to be 
backported.

Maybe Nick or Nathan knows what's up here?