linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] rust: arch/um: Rust support for UML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72nsTR0Ez4_q_J=Vhoy+SACwnNzRVLKx6_707mP8N6VgGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 17 Dec 2022 12:59:25 +0100
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
        Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] rust: arch/um: Rust support for UML

On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 5:44 AM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> This series adds support for building and running code in the Rust
> programming language under x86_64 UML kernels.

Thanks for all your work and support on getting KUnit/UML + Rust ready
(long before we landed in mainline!).

> This series is currently based on the uml/next branch: I'm happy to
> rebase it next year once we're past the 6.2 merge window (though it
> applies cleanly to torvalds/master at the moment). Equally, it
> should be possible to take these changes in via the rust tree instead,
> but since it's mostly UML Makefile changes, it probably makes more sense
> for it to go in via the uml tree.

Agreed.

> Also note that this series marks UML as a "maintained" architecture for
> Rust support. It's definitely my intention to keep this working, but if

That is great -- thanks for stepping up!

Cheers,
Miguel