linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 54/73] blk-mq: fix possible memleak when register 'hctx' failed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221218160741.927862-54-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 18 Dec 2022 11:07:22 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 54/73] blk-mq: fix possible memleak when register 'hctx' failed

From: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit 4b7a21c57b14fbcd0e1729150189e5933f5088e9 ]

There's issue as follows when do fault injection test:
unreferenced object 0xffff888132a9f400 (size 512):
  comm "insmod", pid 308021, jiffies 4324277909 (age 509.733s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 f4 a9 32 81 88 ff ff  ...........2....
    08 f4 a9 32 81 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ...2............
  backtrace:
    [<00000000e8952bb4>] kmalloc_node_trace+0x22/0xa0
    [<00000000f9980e0f>] blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx+0x3f1/0x7e0
    [<000000002e719efa>] blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs+0x1e6/0x230
    [<000000004f1fda40>] blk_mq_init_allocated_queue+0x27e/0x910
    [<00000000287123ec>] __blk_mq_alloc_disk+0x67/0xf0
    [<00000000a2a34657>] 0xffffffffa2ad310f
    [<00000000b173f718>] 0xffffffffa2af824a
    [<0000000095a1dabb>] do_one_initcall+0x87/0x2a0
    [<00000000f32fdf93>] do_init_module+0xdf/0x320
    [<00000000cbe8541e>] load_module+0x3006/0x3390
    [<0000000069ed1bdb>] __do_sys_finit_module+0x113/0x1b0
    [<00000000a1a29ae8>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
    [<000000009cd878b0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

Fault injection context as follows:
 kobject_add
 blk_mq_register_hctx
 blk_mq_sysfs_register
 blk_register_queue
 device_add_disk
 null_add_dev.part.0 [null_blk]

As 'blk_mq_register_hctx' may already add some objects when failed halfway,
but there isn't do fallback, caller don't know which objects add failed.
To solve above issue just do fallback when add objects failed halfway in
'blk_mq_register_hctx'.

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117022940.873959-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 block/blk-mq-sysfs.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sysfs.c b/block/blk-mq-sysfs.c
index 93997d297d42..4515288fbe35 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sysfs.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sysfs.c
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static int blk_mq_register_hctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 {
 	struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
 	struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx;
-	int i, ret;
+	int i, j, ret;
 
 	if (!hctx->nr_ctx)
 		return 0;
@@ -197,9 +197,16 @@ static int blk_mq_register_hctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 	hctx_for_each_ctx(hctx, ctx, i) {
 		ret = kobject_add(&ctx->kobj, &hctx->kobj, "cpu%u", ctx->cpu);
 		if (ret)
-			break;
+			goto out;
 	}
 
+	return 0;
+out:
+	hctx_for_each_ctx(hctx, ctx, j) {
+		if (j < i)
+			kobject_del(&ctx->kobj);
+	}
+	kobject_del(&hctx->kobj);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.35.1