[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpop-xO3TJgxHQ7PRCEi55tQNEM58vbOsKwjC_vQRCHtqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 13:28:03 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@...il.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Adam Skladowski <a39.skl@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@...cinc.com>,
Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add SM6115 support
Hi,
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 12:01, Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > So, hopefully you can skip this patch completely by depending on the
> > generic "qcom,smmu-500" compatible.
>
> To be clear -- I still need the qcom,SOC-smmu-500 compatible in DT and
> bindings, but not in the driver (i.e driver will pick generic)?
>
> Then this can indeed be dropped (but it is merged in linux-next ATM,
> 6.2-rc1 based next won't have it, I guess?).
The thread got bumped in my email client, so I replied with my review
as if these patches were brand new. However I failed to notice that
the patches were already accepted by Will Deacon. And that my rework
happened already on top of your patches. So, you don't have to do
anything, the IOMMU part will be a part of 6.3. Please excuse me for
the noise.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists