lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpop-xO3TJgxHQ7PRCEi55tQNEM58vbOsKwjC_vQRCHtqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Dec 2022 13:28:03 +0200
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@...il.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Adam Skladowski <a39.skl@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@...cinc.com>,
        Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add SM6115 support

Hi,

On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 12:01, Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > So, hopefully you can skip this patch completely by depending on the
> > generic "qcom,smmu-500" compatible.
>
> To be clear -- I still need the qcom,SOC-smmu-500 compatible in DT and
> bindings, but not in the driver (i.e driver will pick generic)?
>
> Then this can indeed be dropped (but it is merged in linux-next ATM,
> 6.2-rc1 based next won't have it, I guess?).

The thread got bumped in my email client, so I replied with my review
as if these patches were brand new. However I failed to notice that
the patches were already accepted by Will Deacon. And that my rework
happened already on top of your patches. So, you don't have to do
anything, the IOMMU part will be a part of 6.3. Please excuse me for
the noise.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ