[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9d9bfd6f-087b-88dc-1b7e-ada26a9318fa@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 15:19:52 +0200
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
kim.phillips@....com, german.gomez@....com, ravi.bangoria@....com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tool: Fix output unexpected messages in quiet mode
On 19/12/22 15:14, Yang Jihong wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2022/12/19 18:28, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 19/12/22 11:28, Yang Jihong wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 2022/12/19 14:59, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>>> On 19/12/22 04:49, Yang Jihong wrote:
>>>>> When perf uses quiet mode, perf_quiet_option sets debug_peo_args to -1,
>>>>
>>>> Seems like redirect_to_stderr has similar issue?
>>> The redirect_to_stderr is used only in the veprintf function:
>>>
>>> int veprintf(int level, int var, const char *fmt, va_list args)
>>> {
>>> int ret = 0;
>>>
>>> if (var >= level) {
>>> if (use_browser >= 1 && redirect_to_stderr <= 0) {
>>> ui_helpline__vshow(fmt, args);
>>> } else {
>>> ret = fprintf_time(debug_file);
>>> ret += vfprintf(debug_file, fmt, args);
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> If use quiet mode, verbose sets to -1. (also assigned in the perf_quiet_option function)
>>> Because "var >= level" is false, veprintf function returns directly, which avoids this problem.
>>>
>>> However, there are cases where:
>>> # perf --debug stderr=-1 report -vvv 2>/tmp/debug
>>>
>>> If stderr is -1, should we redirect pr_debug in this case?
>>
>> tools/perf/Documentation/perf.txt says debug variables are in value
>> range (0, 10), so -1 is invalid anyway.
>>
> Okay, I see.
>>>
>>> Because I'm not sure if this is a problem,
>>> if redirect_to_stderr needs to be fixed as well,
>>> let me know and I'll submit a patch to fix it.
>>
>> perf_quiet_option() sets redirect_to_stderr = -1 with the intention
>> that it turns it off, but it doesn't, although it gets turned of by
>> verbose = -1. Perhaps set redirect_to_stderr = 0 in perf_quiet_option() ?
>>
> I think it's better to fix redirect_to_stderr and debug_peo_args in the same way (because they're similar):
>
> Solution A:
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/debug.c b/tools/perf/util/debug.c
> index 65e6c22f38e4..908b26e579e5 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/debug.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/debug.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int veprintf(int level, int var, const char *fmt, va_list args)
> int ret = 0;
>
> if (var >= level) {
> - if (use_browser >= 1 && !redirect_to_stderr) {
> + if (use_browser >= 1 && redirect_to_stderr <= 0) {
> ui_helpline__vshow(fmt, args);
> } else {
> ret = fprintf_time(debug_file);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/debug.h b/tools/perf/util/debug.h
> index f99468a7f681..f6ab84c93ec0 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/debug.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/debug.h
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ extern int debug_data_convert;
>
> /* Special macro to print perf_event_open arguments/return value. */
> #define pr_debug2_peo(fmt, ...) { \
> - if (debug_peo_args) \
> + if (debug_peo_args > 0) \
> pr_debugN(0, pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> else \
> pr_debugN(2, pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index 999dd1700502..45cf144c5d5d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -1775,7 +1775,7 @@ static int __open_attr__fprintf(FILE *fp, const char *name, const char *val,
>
> static void display_attr(struct perf_event_attr *attr)
> {
> - if (verbose >= 2 || debug_peo_args) {
> + if (verbose >= 2 || debug_peo_args > 0) {
> fprintf(stderr, "%.60s\n", graph_dotted_line);
> fprintf(stderr, "perf_event_attr:\n");
> perf_event_attr__fprintf(stderr, attr, __open_attr__fprintf, NULL);
>
> or
> Solution B:
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/debug.c b/tools/perf/util/debug.c
> index 908b26e579e5..e3acc213edd1 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/debug.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/debug.c
> @@ -241,6 +241,9 @@ int perf_quiet_option(void)
> opt++;
> }
>
> + redirect_to_stderr = 0;
> + debug_peo_args = 0;
> +
That seems good to me.
>
>> I see we have another problem as well: places that check "if (verbose)"
>> instead of "if (verbose > 0)"
> Yes, places that "if (verbose)" also have problems, I'll submit a patch to change them to "if (verbose > 0)"
Thank you!
>
> In addition, I found another problem, perf lock/stat/probe does not call the perf_quiet_option function when quiet is true.
>
> Thanks,
> Yang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists