[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221219133736.1387008-3-pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 21:37:34 +0800
From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...weicloud.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>,
Pu Lehui <pulehui@...weicloud.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/4] riscv, bpf: Factor out emit_call for kernel and bpf context
From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>
The current emit_call function is not suitable for kernel
function call as it store return value to bpf R0 register.
We can separate it out for common use. Meanwhile, simplify
judgment logic, that is, fixed function address can use jal
or auipc+jalr, while the unfixed can use only auipc+jalr.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>
---
arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 30 +++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 5b568ba6dcfe..bf4721a99a09 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -428,12 +428,12 @@ static void emit_sext_32_rd(u8 *rd, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
*rd = RV_REG_T2;
}
-static int emit_jump_and_link(u8 rd, s64 rvoff, bool force_jalr,
+static int emit_jump_and_link(u8 rd, s64 rvoff, bool fixed_addr,
struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
{
s64 upper, lower;
- if (rvoff && is_21b_int(rvoff) && !force_jalr) {
+ if (rvoff && fixed_addr && is_21b_int(rvoff)) {
emit(rv_jal(rd, rvoff >> 1), ctx);
return 0;
} else if (in_auipc_jalr_range(rvoff)) {
@@ -454,24 +454,17 @@ static bool is_signed_bpf_cond(u8 cond)
cond == BPF_JSGE || cond == BPF_JSLE;
}
-static int emit_call(bool fixed, u64 addr, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
+static int emit_call(u64 addr, bool fixed_addr, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
{
s64 off = 0;
u64 ip;
- u8 rd;
- int ret;
if (addr && ctx->insns) {
ip = (u64)(long)(ctx->insns + ctx->ninsns);
off = addr - ip;
}
- ret = emit_jump_and_link(RV_REG_RA, off, !fixed, ctx);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- rd = bpf_to_rv_reg(BPF_REG_0, ctx);
- emit_mv(rd, RV_REG_A0, ctx);
- return 0;
+ return emit_jump_and_link(RV_REG_RA, off, fixed_addr, ctx);
}
static void emit_atomic(u8 rd, u8 rs, s16 off, s32 imm, bool is64,
@@ -913,7 +906,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
/* JUMP off */
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JA:
rvoff = rv_offset(i, off, ctx);
- ret = emit_jump_and_link(RV_REG_ZERO, rvoff, false, ctx);
+ ret = emit_jump_and_link(RV_REG_ZERO, rvoff, true, ctx);
if (ret)
return ret;
break;
@@ -1032,17 +1025,20 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
/* function call */
case BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL:
{
- bool fixed;
+ bool fixed_addr;
u64 addr;
mark_call(ctx);
- ret = bpf_jit_get_func_addr(ctx->prog, insn, extra_pass, &addr,
- &fixed);
+ ret = bpf_jit_get_func_addr(ctx->prog, insn, extra_pass,
+ &addr, &fixed_addr);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- ret = emit_call(fixed, addr, ctx);
+
+ ret = emit_call(addr, fixed_addr, ctx);
if (ret)
return ret;
+
+ emit_mv(bpf_to_rv_reg(BPF_REG_0, ctx), RV_REG_A0, ctx);
break;
}
/* tail call */
@@ -1057,7 +1053,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
break;
rvoff = epilogue_offset(ctx);
- ret = emit_jump_and_link(RV_REG_ZERO, rvoff, false, ctx);
+ ret = emit_jump_and_link(RV_REG_ZERO, rvoff, true, ctx);
if (ret)
return ret;
break;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists