lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list] 
Message-ID: <20221219144658.26620-15-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Date:   Mon, 19 Dec 2022 17:46:45 +0300
From:   Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
To:     Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Cai Huoqing <cai.huoqing@...ux.dev>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
CC:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        caihuoqing <caihuoqing@...du.com>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v8 14/26] dmaengine: dw-edma: Rename DebugFS dentry variables to 'dent'

Since we are about to add the eDMA channels direction support to the
debugfs module it will be confusing to have both the DebugFS directory and
the channels direction short names used in the same code. As a preparation
patch let's convert the DebugFS dentry 'dir' variables to having the
'dent' name so to prevent the confusion.

Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>

---

Changelog v2:
- This is a new patch added in v2. (@Manivannan)
---
 drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c | 46 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c
index 78f15e4b07ac..7bb3363b40e4 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static int dw_edma_debugfs_u32_get(void *data, u64 *val)
 DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(fops_x32, dw_edma_debugfs_u32_get, NULL, "0x%08llx\n");
 
 static void dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(const struct dw_edma_debugfs_entry ini[],
-				       int nr_entries, struct dentry *dir)
+				       int nr_entries, struct dentry *dent)
 {
 	struct dw_edma_debugfs_entry *entries;
 	int i;
@@ -109,13 +109,13 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(const struct dw_edma_debugfs_entry ini[],
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_entries; i++) {
 		entries[i] = ini[i];
 
-		debugfs_create_file_unsafe(entries[i].name, 0444, dir,
+		debugfs_create_file_unsafe(entries[i].name, 0444, dent,
 					   &entries[i], &fops_x32);
 	}
 }
 
 static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_ch(struct dw_edma_v0_ch_regs __iomem *regs,
-				    struct dentry *dir)
+				    struct dentry *dent)
 {
 	const struct dw_edma_debugfs_entry debugfs_regs[] = {
 		REGISTER(ch_control1),
@@ -131,10 +131,10 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_ch(struct dw_edma_v0_ch_regs __iomem *regs,
 	int nr_entries;
 
 	nr_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_regs);
-	dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(debugfs_regs, nr_entries, dir);
+	dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(debugfs_regs, nr_entries, dent);
 }
 
-static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_wr(struct dentry *dir)
+static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_wr(struct dentry *dent)
 {
 	const struct dw_edma_debugfs_entry debugfs_regs[] = {
 		/* eDMA global registers */
@@ -171,34 +171,34 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_wr(struct dentry *dir)
 		WR_REGISTER_UNROLL(ch6_pwr_en),
 		WR_REGISTER_UNROLL(ch7_pwr_en),
 	};
-	struct dentry *regs_dir, *ch_dir;
+	struct dentry *regs_dent, *ch_dent;
 	int nr_entries, i;
 	char name[16];
 
-	regs_dir = debugfs_create_dir(WRITE_STR, dir);
+	regs_dent = debugfs_create_dir(WRITE_STR, dent);
 
 	nr_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_regs);
-	dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(debugfs_regs, nr_entries, regs_dir);
+	dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(debugfs_regs, nr_entries, regs_dent);
 
 	if (dw->chip->mf == EDMA_MF_HDMA_COMPAT) {
 		nr_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_unroll_regs);
 		dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(debugfs_unroll_regs, nr_entries,
-					   regs_dir);
+					   regs_dent);
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < dw->wr_ch_cnt; i++) {
 		snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s:%d", CHANNEL_STR, i);
 
-		ch_dir = debugfs_create_dir(name, regs_dir);
+		ch_dent = debugfs_create_dir(name, regs_dent);
 
-		dw_edma_debugfs_regs_ch(&regs->type.unroll.ch[i].wr, ch_dir);
+		dw_edma_debugfs_regs_ch(&regs->type.unroll.ch[i].wr, ch_dent);
 
 		lim[0][i].start = &regs->type.unroll.ch[i].wr;
 		lim[0][i].end = &regs->type.unroll.ch[i].padding_1[0];
 	}
 }
 
-static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_rd(struct dentry *dir)
+static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_rd(struct dentry *dent)
 {
 	const struct dw_edma_debugfs_entry debugfs_regs[] = {
 		/* eDMA global registers */
@@ -236,27 +236,27 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_rd(struct dentry *dir)
 		RD_REGISTER_UNROLL(ch6_pwr_en),
 		RD_REGISTER_UNROLL(ch7_pwr_en),
 	};
-	struct dentry *regs_dir, *ch_dir;
+	struct dentry *regs_dent, *ch_dent;
 	int nr_entries, i;
 	char name[16];
 
-	regs_dir = debugfs_create_dir(READ_STR, dir);
+	regs_dent = debugfs_create_dir(READ_STR, dent);
 
 	nr_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_regs);
-	dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(debugfs_regs, nr_entries, regs_dir);
+	dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(debugfs_regs, nr_entries, regs_dent);
 
 	if (dw->chip->mf == EDMA_MF_HDMA_COMPAT) {
 		nr_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_unroll_regs);
 		dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(debugfs_unroll_regs, nr_entries,
-					   regs_dir);
+					   regs_dent);
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < dw->rd_ch_cnt; i++) {
 		snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s:%d", CHANNEL_STR, i);
 
-		ch_dir = debugfs_create_dir(name, regs_dir);
+		ch_dent = debugfs_create_dir(name, regs_dent);
 
-		dw_edma_debugfs_regs_ch(&regs->type.unroll.ch[i].rd, ch_dir);
+		dw_edma_debugfs_regs_ch(&regs->type.unroll.ch[i].rd, ch_dent);
 
 		lim[1][i].start = &regs->type.unroll.ch[i].rd;
 		lim[1][i].end = &regs->type.unroll.ch[i].padding_2[0];
@@ -269,16 +269,16 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs(void)
 		REGISTER(ctrl_data_arb_prior),
 		REGISTER(ctrl),
 	};
-	struct dentry *regs_dir;
+	struct dentry *regs_dent;
 	int nr_entries;
 
-	regs_dir = debugfs_create_dir(REGISTERS_STR, dw->debugfs);
+	regs_dent = debugfs_create_dir(REGISTERS_STR, dw->debugfs);
 
 	nr_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_regs);
-	dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(debugfs_regs, nr_entries, regs_dir);
+	dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(debugfs_regs, nr_entries, regs_dent);
 
-	dw_edma_debugfs_regs_wr(regs_dir);
-	dw_edma_debugfs_regs_rd(regs_dir);
+	dw_edma_debugfs_regs_wr(regs_dent);
+	dw_edma_debugfs_regs_rd(regs_dent);
 }
 
 void dw_edma_v0_debugfs_on(struct dw_edma *_dw)
-- 
2.38.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ