[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d68c9137-f485-e0a0-dfc3-c72c26d0433a@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 00:12:52 +0900
From: Tokunori Ikegami <ikegami.t@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Mauro Lima <mauro.lima@...ypsium.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: cfi: allow building spi-intel standalone
On 2022/12/16 1:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann<arnd@...db.de>
>
> When MTD or MTD_CFI_GEOMETRY is disabled, the spi-intel driver
> fails to build, as it includes the shared CFI header:
The header file linux/mtd/cfi.h is included by the head file
linux/mtd/spi-nor.h so seems the warning caused.
Is it really necessary to inculude linux/mtd/cfi.h from linux/mtd/spi-nor.h?
(It seems that it can be resolved the issue by removing the including
cfi.h from spi-nor.h if unnecessary.)
>
> include/linux/mtd/cfi.h:62:2: error: #warning No CONFIG_MTD_CFI_Ix selected. No NOR chip support can work. [-Werror=cpp]
> 62 | #warning No CONFIG_MTD_CFI_Ix selected. No NOR chip support can work.
>
> Use an #ifdef here to guard the settings so the header can be included
> in all configurations.
>
> Fixes: e23e5a05d1fd ("mtd: spi-nor: intel-spi: Convert to SPI MEM")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann<arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> include/linux/mtd/cfi.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/cfi.h b/include/linux/mtd/cfi.h
> index d88bb56c18e2..0e87b6e2faad 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/cfi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/cfi.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/mtd/cfi_endian.h>
> #include <linux/mtd/xip.h>
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MTD)
Is it enough to check only CONFIG_MTD here as not necessary to check if
MTD_CFI_GEOMETRY also?
By the way it seems also that it is needed to use #ifdef only for the
cfi_interleave warning checking as below.
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MTD) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MTD_CFI_GEOMETRY)
#ifndef cfi_interleave
#warning No CONFIG_MTD_CFI_Ix selected. No NOR chip support can work.
static inline int cfi_interleave(void *cfi)
{
BUG();
return 0;
}
#endif /* cfi_interleave */
#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MTD) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MTD_CFI_GEOMETRY) */
Note: The cfi_interleave warning checking was implemented by the
following commit.
241651d04d67 ("[MTD] Fix CFI build error when no map width or
interleave supported")
> #ifdef CONFIG_MTD_CFI_I1
> #define cfi_interleave(cfi) 1
> #define cfi_interleave_is_1(cfi) (cfi_interleave(cfi) == 1)
> @@ -88,7 +89,7 @@ static inline int cfi_interleave_supported(int i)
> return 0;
> }
> }
> -
> +#endif
>
> /* NB: these values must represents the number of bytes needed to meet the
> * device type (x8, x16, x32). Eg. a 32 bit device is 4 x 8 bytes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists