linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] dt-bindings: media: rockchip-vpu: Add rk3588 vpu compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Dec 2022 17:06:15 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
        ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        mchehab@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, heiko@...ech.de,
        daniel.almeida@...labora.com, nicolas.dufresne@...labora.co.uk
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] dt-bindings: media: rockchip-vpu: Add rk3588 vpu
 compatible

On 19/12/2022 16:56, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> Add compatible for rk3588 AV1 vpu decoder.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml
> index 6cc4d3e5a61d..8454df53f5cb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ properties:
>            - rockchip,rk3399-vpu
>            - rockchip,px30-vpu
>            - rockchip,rk3568-vpu
> +          - rockchip,rk3588-av1-vpu

Why "av1" suffix? Is there another type (different device, different
programming model) expected on rk3588?

Best regards,
Krzysztof