[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACycT3u237c2jHaYeoPQoXK1eb4FDOJJcc6_21N3m=aBHsDwFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 12:38:58 +0800
From: Yongji Xie <xieyongji@...edance.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] vdpa: Add set_irq_affinity callback in vdpa_config_ops
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 11:58 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 4:43 PM Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com> wrote:
> >
> > This introduces set_irq_affinity callback in
> > vdpa_config_ops so that vdpa device driver can
> > get the interrupt affinity hint from the virtio
> > device driver. The interrupt affinity hint would
> > be needed by the interrupt affinity spreading
> > mechanism.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c | 4 ++++
> > include/linux/vdpa.h | 8 ++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
> > index 08084b49e5a1..4731e4616ee0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
> > @@ -275,9 +275,13 @@ static int virtio_vdpa_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned int nvqs,
> > struct virtio_vdpa_device *vd_dev = to_virtio_vdpa_device(vdev);
> > struct vdpa_device *vdpa = vd_get_vdpa(vdev);
> > const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
> > + struct irq_affinity default_affd = { 0 };
> > struct vdpa_callback cb;
> > int i, err, queue_idx = 0;
> >
> > + if (ops->set_irq_affinity)
> > + ops->set_irq_affinity(vdpa, desc ? desc : &default_affd);
>
> I wonder if we need to do this in vhost-vDPA.
I don't get why we need to do this in vhost-vDPA? Should this be done in VM?
> Or it's better to have a
> default affinity by the vDPA parent
>
I think both are OK. But the default value should always be zero, so I
put it in a common place.
> (Looking at virtio-pci, it doesn't do something like this).
>
Yes, but we did something like this in the pci layer:
pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity().
Thanks,
Yongji
Powered by blists - more mailing lists