lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MW3PR12MB455332539171D4A7465C090E95E59@MW3PR12MB4553.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Dec 2022 19:59:51 +0000
From:   "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@....com>
To:     Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     "fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "paulmck@...nel.org" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "quic_neeraju@...cinc.com" <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
        "rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        "damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com" <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        "songmuchun@...edance.com" <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "jpoimboe@...nel.org" <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "chang.seok.bae@...el.com" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
        "pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com" 
        <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
        "jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        "daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com" <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Das1, Sandipan" <Sandipan.Das@....com>,
        "tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bagasdotme@...il.com" <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
        "eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>,
        "christophe.leroy@...roup.eu" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        "jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        "adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        "quic_jiles@...cinc.com" <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
        "peternewman@...gle.com" <peternewman@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 12/13] x86/resctrl: Replace smp_call_function_many()
 with on_each_cpu_mask()

[AMD Official Use Only - General]

Hi Reinette,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2022 12:27 PM
> To: Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@....com>; corbet@....net;
> tglx@...utronix.de; mingo@...hat.com; bp@...en8.de
> Cc: fenghua.yu@...el.com; dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com; x86@...nel.org;
> hpa@...or.com; paulmck@...nel.org; akpm@...ux-foundation.org;
> quic_neeraju@...cinc.com; rdunlap@...radead.org;
> damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com; songmuchun@...edance.com;
> peterz@...radead.org; jpoimboe@...nel.org; pbonzini@...hat.com;
> chang.seok.bae@...el.com; pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com;
> jmattson@...gle.com; daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com; Das1, Sandipan
> <Sandipan.Das@....com>; tony.luck@...el.com; james.morse@....com;
> linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> bagasdotme@...il.com; eranian@...gle.com; christophe.leroy@...roup.eu;
> jarkko@...nel.org; adrian.hunter@...el.com; quic_jiles@...cinc.com;
> peternewman@...gle.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/13] x86/resctrl: Replace smp_call_function_many()
> with on_each_cpu_mask()
> 
> Hi Babu,
> 
> On 12/1/2022 7:37 AM, Babu Moger wrote:
> > The call on_each_cpu_mask() runs the function on each CPU specified by
> > cpumask, which may include the local processor. So, replace the call
> > smp_call_function_many() with on_each_cpu_mask() to simplify the code.
> 
> Please move the solution to a new paragraph and drop the "So,". The two
> instances of "the call" can be dropped also.

Sure.
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
> > ---
> 
> Could you please move this patch to the beginning of this series?
> Fixes and cleanups should go before new features.

Sure.

> 
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c |   29 ++++++++---------------------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> > b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> > index 6897c480ae55..68e14831a638 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> > @@ -325,12 +325,7 @@ static void update_cpu_closid_rmid(void *info)
> > static void  update_closid_rmid(const struct cpumask *cpu_mask, struct
> > rdtgroup *r)  {
> > -	int cpu = get_cpu();
> > -
> > -	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_mask))
> > -		update_cpu_closid_rmid(r);
> > -	smp_call_function_many(cpu_mask, update_cpu_closid_rmid, r, 1);
> > -	put_cpu();
> > +	on_each_cpu_mask(cpu_mask, update_cpu_closid_rmid, r, 1);
> >  }
> >
> >  static int cpus_mon_write(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, cpumask_var_t
> > newmask, @@ -2135,13 +2130,9 @@ static int set_cache_qos_cfg(int level,
> bool enable)
> >  			/* Pick one CPU from each domain instance to update
> MSR */
> >  			cpumask_set_cpu(cpumask_any(&d->cpu_mask),
> cpu_mask);
> >  	}
> > -	cpu = get_cpu();
> > -	/* Update QOS_CFG MSR on this cpu if it's in cpu_mask. */
> > -	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_mask))
> > -		update(&enable);
> > -	/* Update QOS_CFG MSR on all other cpus in cpu_mask. */
> > -	smp_call_function_many(cpu_mask, update, &enable, 1);
> > -	put_cpu();
> > +
> > +	/* Update QOS_CFG MSR on all the CPUs in cpu_mask */
> > +	on_each_cpu_mask(cpu_mask, update, &enable, 1);
> >
> >  	free_cpumask_var(cpu_mask);
> >
> > @@ -2618,7 +2609,7 @@ static int reset_all_ctrls(struct rdt_resource *r)
> >  	struct msr_param msr_param;
> >  	cpumask_var_t cpu_mask;
> >  	struct rdt_domain *d;
> > -	int i, cpu;
> > +	int i;
> >
> >  	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_mask, GFP_KERNEL))
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > @@ -2639,13 +2630,9 @@ static int reset_all_ctrls(struct rdt_resource *r)
> >  		for (i = 0; i < hw_res->num_closid; i++)
> >  			hw_dom->ctrl_val[i] = r->default_ctrl;
> >  	}
> > -	cpu = get_cpu();
> > -	/* Update CBM on this cpu if it's in cpu_mask. */
> > -	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_mask))
> > -		rdt_ctrl_update(&msr_param);
> > -	/* Update CBM on all other cpus in cpu_mask. */
> > -	smp_call_function_many(cpu_mask, rdt_ctrl_update, &msr_param, 1);
> > -	put_cpu();
> > +
> > +	/* Update CBM on all the CPUs in cpu_mask */
> > +	on_each_cpu_mask(cpu_mask, rdt_ctrl_update, &msr_param, 1);
> >
> >  	free_cpumask_var(cpu_mask);
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Should the snippet in resctrl_arch_update_domains() also be updated?

Yes. It should be changed also.  Will fix it.
Thanks
Babu
> 
> Reinette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ