linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 01/12] crypto: Remove u128 usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:11:37 -0800
From:   "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
CC:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, corbet@....net, will@...nel.org,
        boqun.feng@...il.com, mark.rutland@....com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, dennis@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
        cl@...ux.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
        agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
        svens@...ux.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        x86@...nel.org, joro@...tes.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@....com,
        robin.murphy@....com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
        baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, vbabka@...e.cz,
        roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 01/12] crypto: Remove u128 usage

On December 19, 2022 7:50:47 PM PST, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 06:03:04PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>>
>> Is there a patch at the end of the series that adds it back in to use u128?
>
>Could we do some ifdef trickery to reduce the amount of code churn
>please? Changing everything away from u128 and then back to it seems
>silly.
>
>Thanks,

Seems like "merging common code snippets" is something we at least used to do with single patches...