[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y6E6dVcdHk2zK+/1@qemulion>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:00:45 +0530
From: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...rosoft.com>,
Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@...ux.microsoft.com>, drv@...lo.com
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: libfc: Use refcount_* APIs for reference count
management
The atomic_t API based object reference counter management is prone to
counter value overflows, object use-after-free issues and to return
puzzling values. The improved refcount_t APIs are designed to address
these known issues with atomic_t reference counter management. This
white paper [1] has detailed reasons for moving from atomic_t to
refcount_t APIs. Hence replace the atomic_* based implementation by its
refcount_* based equivalent.
The issue is identified using atomic_as_refcounter.cocci Coccinelle
semantic patch script.
[1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.06175.pdf
Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
---
Note: The proposal is compile tested only.
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c | 10 +++++-----
include/scsi/libfc.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
index 1d91c457527f..1c49fddb65e3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static const char *fc_exch_rctl_name(unsigned int op)
*/
static inline void fc_exch_hold(struct fc_exch *ep)
{
- atomic_inc(&ep->ex_refcnt);
+ refcount_inc(&ep->ex_refcnt);
}
/**
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static void fc_exch_release(struct fc_exch *ep)
{
struct fc_exch_mgr *mp;
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ep->ex_refcnt)) {
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&ep->ex_refcnt)) {
mp = ep->em;
if (ep->destructor)
ep->destructor(&ep->seq, ep->arg);
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static inline void fc_exch_timer_cancel(struct fc_exch *ep)
{
if (cancel_delayed_work(&ep->timeout_work)) {
FC_EXCH_DBG(ep, "Exchange timer canceled\n");
- atomic_dec(&ep->ex_refcnt); /* drop hold for timer */
+ refcount_dec(&ep->ex_refcnt); /* drop hold for timer */
}
}
@@ -1897,7 +1897,7 @@ static void fc_exch_reset(struct fc_exch *ep)
ep->state |= FC_EX_RST_CLEANUP;
fc_exch_timer_cancel(ep);
if (ep->esb_stat & ESB_ST_REC_QUAL)
- atomic_dec(&ep->ex_refcnt); /* drop hold for rec_qual */
+ refcount_dec(&ep->ex_refcnt); /* drop hold for rec_qual */
ep->esb_stat &= ~ESB_ST_REC_QUAL;
sp = &ep->seq;
rc = fc_exch_done_locked(ep);
@@ -2332,7 +2332,7 @@ static void fc_exch_els_rrq(struct fc_frame *fp)
*/
if (ep->esb_stat & ESB_ST_REC_QUAL) {
ep->esb_stat &= ~ESB_ST_REC_QUAL;
- atomic_dec(&ep->ex_refcnt); /* drop hold for rec qual */
+ refcount_dec(&ep->ex_refcnt); /* drop hold for rec qual */
}
if (ep->esb_stat & ESB_ST_COMPLETE)
fc_exch_timer_cancel(ep);
diff --git a/include/scsi/libfc.h b/include/scsi/libfc.h
index 6e29e1719db1..ce65149b300c 100644
--- a/include/scsi/libfc.h
+++ b/include/scsi/libfc.h
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ struct fc_seq {
*/
struct fc_exch {
spinlock_t ex_lock;
- atomic_t ex_refcnt;
+ refcount_t ex_refcnt;
enum fc_class class;
struct fc_exch_mgr *em;
struct fc_exch_pool *pool;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists