linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/3] crypto: x86/ghash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221220054042.188537-3-ebiggers@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Dec 2022 21:40:41 -0800
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, corbet@....net,
        will@...nel.org, boqun.feng@...il.com, mark.rutland@....com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, dennis@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
        cl@...ux.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
        agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
        svens@...ux.ibm.com, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        davem@...emloft.net, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, joro@...tes.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@....com,
        robin.murphy@....com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
        baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, vbabka@...e.cz,
        roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] crypto: x86/ghash - use le128 instead of u128

From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>

The u128 struct type is going away, so make ghash-clmulni-intel use
le128 instead.  Note that the field names a and b swapped, as they were
backwards with u128.  (a is meant to be high-order and b low-order.)

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
---
 arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_asm.S  |  4 ++--
 arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_glue.c | 12 ++++++------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_asm.S b/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_asm.S
index 2bf871899920..9dfeb4d31b92 100644
--- a/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_asm.S
+++ b/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_asm.S
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL(__clmul_gf128mul_ble)
 	RET
 SYM_FUNC_END(__clmul_gf128mul_ble)
 
-/* void clmul_ghash_mul(char *dst, const u128 *shash) */
+/* void clmul_ghash_mul(char *dst, const le128 *shash) */
 SYM_FUNC_START(clmul_ghash_mul)
 	FRAME_BEGIN
 	movups (%rdi), DATA
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(clmul_ghash_mul)
 
 /*
  * void clmul_ghash_update(char *dst, const char *src, unsigned int srclen,
- *			   const u128 *shash);
+ *			   const le128 *shash);
  */
 SYM_FUNC_START(clmul_ghash_update)
 	FRAME_BEGIN
diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_glue.c b/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_glue.c
index c0ab0ff4af65..9453b094bb3b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_glue.c
+++ b/arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_glue.c
@@ -24,17 +24,17 @@
 #define GHASH_BLOCK_SIZE	16
 #define GHASH_DIGEST_SIZE	16
 
-void clmul_ghash_mul(char *dst, const u128 *shash);
+void clmul_ghash_mul(char *dst, const le128 *shash);
 
 void clmul_ghash_update(char *dst, const char *src, unsigned int srclen,
-			const u128 *shash);
+			const le128 *shash);
 
 struct ghash_async_ctx {
 	struct cryptd_ahash *cryptd_tfm;
 };
 
 struct ghash_ctx {
-	u128 shash;
+	le128 shash;
 };
 
 struct ghash_desc_ctx {
@@ -64,11 +64,11 @@ static int ghash_setkey(struct crypto_shash *tfm,
 	a = get_unaligned_be64(key);
 	b = get_unaligned_be64(key + 8);
 
-	ctx->shash.a = (b << 1) | (a >> 63);
-	ctx->shash.b = (a << 1) | (b >> 63);
+	ctx->shash.a = cpu_to_le64((a << 1) | (b >> 63));
+	ctx->shash.b = cpu_to_le64((b << 1) | (a >> 63));
 
 	if (a >> 63)
-		ctx->shash.b ^= ((u64)0xc2) << 56;
+		ctx->shash.a ^= cpu_to_le64((u64)0xc2 << 56);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.39.0