[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y6FQtNgZy8lXKfiz@sol.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 22:05:40 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Robert Elliott <elliott@....com>
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net, corbet@....net,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] crypto: x86/chacha - add kernel-doc comments to
assembly
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:55:55PM -0600, Robert Elliott wrote:
> +/**
> + * chacha_2block_xor_avx2 - Encrypt 2 blocks using the x86 AVX2 feature set
> + * @state: address of input state matrix, s (%rdi)
> + * @dst: address of up to 2 data blocks output, o (%rsi)
> + * @src: address of up to 2 data blocks input, i (%rdx)
> + * @len: input/output length in bytes (%rcx)
> + * @nrounds: number of rounds (%r8d)
> + *
> + * This function encrypts two ChaCha blocks by loading the state
> + * matrix twice across four AVX registers. It performs matrix operations
> + * on four words in each matrix in parallel, but requires shuffling to
> + * rearrange the words after each round.
2 blocks, or up to 2 blocks? What does that mean?
> + *
> + * Return: none
> + * Prototype: asmlinkage void chacha_2block_xor_avx2(u32 *state, u8 *dst, const u8 *src,
> + * unsigned int len, int nrounds);
When the return type is void, there is no need to write "Return: none".
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists