linux-kernel - Re: [PULL] Networking for next-6.1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221220062844.26368-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Dec 2022 15:28:44 +0900
From:   Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To:     <jirislaby@...nel.org>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        <joannelkoong@...il.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PULL] Networking for next-6.1

From:   Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Date:   Tue, 20 Dec 2022 07:22:56 +0100
> On 19. 12. 22, 0:25, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > From:   Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
> > Date:   Fri, 16 Dec 2022 11:49:01 +0100
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 04. 10. 22, 7:20, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >>> Joanne Koong (7):
> >>
> >>>         net: Add a bhash2 table hashed by port and address
> >>
> >> This makes regression tests of python-ephemeral-port-reserve to fail.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure if the issue is in the commit or in the test.
> > 
> > Hi Jiri,
> > 
> > Thanks for reporting the issue.
> > 
> > It seems we forgot to add TIME_WAIT sockets into bhash2 in
> > inet_twsk_hashdance(), therefore inet_bhash2_conflict() misses
> > TIME_WAIT sockets when validating bind() requests if the address
> > is not a wildcard one.
> > 
> > I'll fix it.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> is there a fix for this available somewhere yet?

Not yet, but I'll CC you when posting a patch.

Thank you.