[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221220072228.GA1724933@chaop.bj.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 15:22:28 +0800
From: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@...el.com>,
"jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>,
"Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
"qemu-devel@...gnu.org" <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
"tabba@...gle.com" <tabba@...gle.com>,
"Hocko, Michal" <mhocko@...e.com>,
"michael.roth@....com" <michael.roth@....com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dhildenb@...hat.com" <dhildenb@...hat.com>,
"bfields@...ldses.org" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"vannapurve@...gle.com" <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
"rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"vbabka@...e.cz" <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"mail@...iej.szmigiero.name" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"qperret@...gle.com" <qperret@...gle.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"ddutile@...hat.com" <ddutile@...hat.com>,
"naoya.horiguchi@....com" <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
"Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"wanpengli@...cent.com" <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
"yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com" <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"hughd@...gle.com" <hughd@...gle.com>,
"aarcange@...hat.com" <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
"jlayton@...nel.org" <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"steven.price@....com" <steven.price@....com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linmiaohe@...wei.com" <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/9] mm: Introduce memfd_restricted system call to
create restricted user memory
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:48:10AM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-12-19 at 15:53 +0800, Chao Peng wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * These pages are currently unmovable so don't place them into
> > > > movable
> > > > + * pageblocks (e.g. CMA and ZONE_MOVABLE).
> > > > + */
> > > > + mapping = memfd->f_mapping;
> > > > + mapping_set_unevictable(mapping);
> > > > + mapping_set_gfp_mask(mapping,
> > > > + mapping_gfp_mask(mapping) & ~__GFP_MOVABLE);
> > >
> > > But, IIUC removing __GFP_MOVABLE flag here only makes page allocation from
> > > non-
> > > movable zones, but doesn't necessarily prevent page from being migrated. My
> > > first glance is you need to implement either a_ops->migrate_folio() or just
> > > get_page() after faulting in the page to prevent.
> >
> > The current api restrictedmem_get_page() already does this, after the
> > caller calling it, it holds a reference to the page. The caller then
> > decides when to call put_page() appropriately.
>
> I tried to dig some history. Perhaps I am missing something, but it seems Kirill
> said in v9 that this code doesn't prevent page migration, and we need to
> increase page refcount in restrictedmem_get_page():
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20221129112139.usp6dqhbih47qpjl@box.shutemov.name/
>
> But looking at this series it seems restrictedmem_get_page() in this v10 is
> identical to the one in v9 (except v10 uses 'folio' instead of 'page')?
restrictedmem_get_page() increases page refcount several versions ago so
no change in v10 is needed. You probably missed my reply:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20221129135844.GA902164@chaop.bj.intel.com/
The current solution is clear: unless we have better approach, we will
let restrictedmem user (KVM in this case) to hold the refcount to
prevent page migration.
Thanks,
Chao
>
> Anyway if this is not fixed, then it should be fixed. Otherwise, a comment at
> the place where page refcount is increased will be helpful to help people
> understand page migration is actually prevented.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists