linux-kernel - [PATCH] virtio_blk: temporary variable type tweak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221220124152.523531-1-mst@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Dec 2022 07:41:53 -0500
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] virtio_blk: temporary variable type tweak

virtblk_result returns blk_status_t which is a bitwise restricted type,
so we are not supposed to stuff it in a plain int temporary variable.
All we do with it is pass it on to a function expecting blk_status_t so
the generated code is ok, but we get warnings from sparse:

drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:326:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) @@     expected int status @@
+got restricted blk_status_t @@
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:334:33: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@     expected restricted
+blk_status_t [usertype] error @@     got int status @@

Make sparse happy by using the correct type.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index 88d8410ecc5e..73cd5db0d7d5 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ static blk_status_t virtblk_setup_cmd(struct virtio_device *vdev,
 static inline void virtblk_request_done(struct request *req)
 {
 	struct virtblk_req *vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
-	int status = virtblk_result(vbr->status);
+	blk_status_t status = virtblk_result(vbr->status);
 
 	virtblk_unmap_data(req, vbr);
 	virtblk_cleanup_cmd(req);
-- 
MST