[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <206f30df-4833-3909-2d01-472fcfa2baa6@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 14:17:45 +0100
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Shaoqin Huang <shaoqin.huang@...el.com>,
Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>,
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, regressions@...ts.linux.dev,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dmitry.fomichev@....com
Subject: Re: next: kernel BUG at drivers/virtio/virtio.c:122!
On 20.12.2022 11:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 06:27:59PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 14:51:54 +0530, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> The qemu-x86_64 and qemu-arm64 boot failed with Linux next-20221220 tag.
>>> It is always reproducible with gcc-11/ gcc-12 and clang tool chains.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> <6>[ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0000000000 [0x000f0510]
>>> <5>[ 0.000000] Linux version 6.1.0-next-20221220 (tuxmake@...make)
>>> (Debian clang version 16.0.0
>>> (++20221218072110+9c1b82599dac-1~exp1~20221218072217.501), Debian LLD
>>> 16.0.0) #1 SMP PREEMPT @1671498176
>>> <5>[ 0.000000] random: crng init done
>>> <6>[ 0.000000] Machine model: linux,dummy-virt
>>> ....
>>> <6>[ 3.571098] loop: module loaded
>>> <6>[ 3.573410] virtio_blk virtio0: 1/0/0 default/read/poll queues
>>> <5>[ 3.578816] virtio_blk virtio0: [vda] 2816420 512-byte logical
>>> blocks (1.44 GB/1.34 GiB)
>>> <4>[ 3.581234] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> <2>[ 3.581595] kernel BUG at drivers/virtio/virtio.c:122!
>>> <0>[ 3.582906] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>>> <4>[ 3.583672] Modules linked in:
>>> <4>[ 3.584905] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
>>> 6.1.0-next-20221220 #1
>>> <4>[ 3.585801] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
>>> <4>[ 3.586591] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT
>>> -SSBS BTYPE=--)
>>> <4>[ 3.587349] pc : virtio_check_driver_offered_feature+0x60/0x6c
>>> <4>[ 3.588613] lr : virtblk_probe+0x7cc/0x8f0
>>> <4>[ 3.588915] sp : ffff80000802b840
>>> <4>[ 3.589314] x29: ffff80000802b850 x28: 0000000000000000 x27:
>>> 0000000000000001
>>> <4>[ 3.590509] x26: 0000000000000001 x25: 0000000000000200 x24:
>>> ffff0000c1699b00
>>> <4>[ 3.590832] x23: 00000000000000fe x22: ffff0000c0313c30 x21:
>>> ffff0000c0313c00
>>> <4>[ 3.591568] x20: ffff0000c02f4080 x19: 0000000000000000 x18:
>>> ffffffffffffffff
>>> <4>[ 3.592056] x17: 00000000ffffffea x16: 00000000fffffffe x15:
>>> 0000000000000004
>>> <4>[ 3.592632] x14: 0000000000000fff x13: ffff800008028000 x12:
>>> ffff80000802c000
>>> <4>[ 3.593157] x11: 000000000000000f x10: 000000000000000f x9 :
>>> ffffae66eee314d8
>>> <4>[ 3.594048] x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 3631383837352e33 x6 :
>>> 202020205b3e353c
>>> <4>[ 3.594429] x5 : 0000000000000001 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 :
>>> ffff80000802b780
>>> <4>[ 3.594956] x2 : ffff80000802b6f8 x1 : 0000000000000011 x0 :
>>> ffff0000c02f4080
>>> <4>[ 3.595811] Call trace:
>>> <4>[ 3.596120] virtio_check_driver_offered_feature+0x60/0x6c
>>> <4>[ 3.596632] virtio_dev_probe+0x274/0x320
>>> <4>[ 3.597064] really_probe+0x178/0x418
>>> <4>[ 3.597547] __driver_probe_device+0x120/0x188
>>> <4>[ 3.597820] driver_probe_device+0x48/0x22c
>>> <4>[ 3.598189] __driver_attach+0xf8/0x250
>>> <4>[ 3.598656] bus_for_each_dev+0x8c/0xd8
>>> <4>[ 3.599151] driver_attach+0x30/0x3c
>>> <4>[ 3.599321] bus_add_driver+0x11c/0x22c
>>> <4>[ 3.599684] driver_register+0x84/0x120
>>> <4>[ 3.600175] register_virtio_driver+0x38/0x48
>>> <4>[ 3.600575] virtio_blk_init+0x6c/0xb4
>>> <4>[ 3.600759] do_one_initcall+0xe0/0x2f8
>>> <4>[ 3.601197] do_initcall_level+0xa8/0x150
>>> <4>[ 3.601703] do_initcalls+0x60/0xa0
>>> <4>[ 3.601892] do_basic_setup+0x28/0x34
>>> <4>[ 3.602229] kernel_init_freeable+0x100/0x178
>>> <4>[ 3.602706] kernel_init+0x2c/0x1b4
>>> <4>[ 3.603162] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>>> <0>[ 3.604398] Code: 540000a0 91001129 f1000508 54ffff61 (d4210000)
>>> <4>[ 3.606108] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>> <6>[ 3.606714] note: swapper/0[1] exited with preempt_count 1
>>> <0>[ 3.608155] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
>>> exitcode=0x0000000b
>>> <2>[ 3.609173] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
>>> <0>[ 3.610506] Kernel Offset: 0x2e66e4800000 from 0xffff800008000000
>>> <0>[ 3.610970] PHYS_OFFSET: 0x40000000
>>> <0>[ 3.611428] CPU features: 0x00000,003a612f,cd22773f
>>> <0>[ 3.612277] Memory Limit: none
>>> <0>[ 3.613192] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to
>>> kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b ]---
>>>
>>> Ref Links,
>>> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20221220/testrun/13764099/suite/log-parser-test/test/check-kernel-bug/details/
>>> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20221220/testrun/13766814/suite/boot/test/clang-nightly-lkftconfig/details/
>>> https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2J9l3qxSBmPWVa1S2uWn0Xuwl1J/config
>>>
>>
>> I think there is a bug, VIRTIO_BLK_F_ZONED depends the CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONE, but
>> checking its code in virtblk_probe does not depend on this config.
>>
>> This option in your config file is indeed not opened.
>>
>>
>> static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev){
>> .....
>> virtblk_update_capacity(vblk, false);
>> virtio_device_ready(vdev);
>>
>> if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_ZONED)) {
>> err = virtblk_probe_zoned_device(vdev, vblk, q);
>> if (err)
>> goto out_cleanup_disk;
>> }
>>
>> dev_info(&vdev->dev, "blk config size: %zu\n",
>> sizeof(struct virtio_blk_config));
>>
>> ....
>>
>> static unsigned int features[] = {
>> VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_GEOMETRY,
>> VIRTIO_BLK_F_RO, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE,
>> VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH, VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY, VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE,
>> VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ, VIRTIO_BLK_F_DISCARD, VIRTIO_BLK_F_WRITE_ZEROES,
>> VIRTIO_BLK_F_SECURE_ERASE, VIRTIO_BLK_F_LIFETIME,
>> #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
>> VIRTIO_BLK_F_ZONED,
>> #endif /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED */
>> }
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
> Oh you are right, I wanted to test it so of course I enabled it.
>
> Testing this fixup now:
>
> commit f9503d0fd839b59e0f48b00c20635437c41420ed
> Author: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> Date: Tue Dec 20 05:53:41 2022 -0500
>
> fixup! virtio-blk: add support for zoned block devices
I also confirm that this patch fixes the issue with broken virtio block
device observed on QEMU arm/arm64 'virt' machines and linux
next-20221220. Thanks for the fix!
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> index ff49052e26f7..d8cdaeb51d1c 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> @@ -775,6 +775,10 @@ static int virtblk_probe_zoned_device(struct virtio_device *vdev,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static inline bool virtblk_has_zoned_feature(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + return virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_ZONED);
> +}
> #else
>
> /*
> @@ -790,6 +794,11 @@ static inline int virtblk_probe_zoned_device(struct virtio_device *vdev,
> {
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
> +
> +static inline bool virtblk_has_zoned_feature(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED */
>
> /* return id (s/n) string for *disk to *id_str
> @@ -1576,11 +1585,11 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> else
> q->limits.discard_granularity = blk_size;
> }
>
> virtblk_update_capacity(vblk, false);
> virtio_device_ready(vdev);
>
> - if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_ZONED)) {
> + if (virtblk_has_zoned_feature(vdev)) {
> err = virtblk_probe_zoned_device(vdev, vblk, q);
> if (err)
> goto out_cleanup_disk;
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Powered by blists - more mailing lists