[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7b6d7e91-ba00-6486-39ae-91fca30b2cfb@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 09:33:03 -0500
From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, freude@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com, mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
fiuczy@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] s390/vfio_ap: always clean up IRQ resources
On 12/19/22 9:10 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:44:37 -0500
> Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Clean up IRQ resources even when a PQAP(ZAPQ) function fails with an error
>> not handled by a case statement.
> Why?
If the ZAPQ failed, then instructions submitted to the same queue will
likewise fail. Are you saying it's not safe to assume, therefore, that
interrupts will not be occurring?
>
> I'm afraid this is a step in the wrong direction...
Please explain why.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
>> index e80c5a6b91be..2dd8db9ddb39 100644
>> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
>> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
>> @@ -1676,7 +1676,7 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
>> "PQAP/ZAPQ for %02x.%04x failed with invalid rc=%u\n",
>> AP_QID_CARD(q->apqn), AP_QID_QUEUE(q->apqn),
>> status.response_code);
>> - return -EIO;
>> + break;
>> }
>>
>> vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources(q);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists