[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221220150550.y5kknqwjc7q5bv75@revolver>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 15:05:52 +0000
From: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>
To: Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@...il.com>
CC: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] maple_tree: refine mab_calc_split function
* Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@...il.com> [221220 09:26]:
> Invert the conditional judgment of the mid_split, to focus
> the return statement in the last statement, which is easier
> to understand and for better readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@...il.com>
> ---
> lib/maple_tree.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
> index 16cdcf309e97..d147669fb99c 100644
> --- a/lib/maple_tree.c
> +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
> @@ -1882,10 +1882,9 @@ static inline int mab_calc_split(struct ma_state *mas,
>
> /* Avoid ending a node on a NULL entry */
> split = mab_no_null_split(bn, split, slot_count);
> - if (!(*mid_split))
> - return split;
>
> - *mid_split = mab_no_null_split(bn, *mid_split, slot_count);
> + if (*mid_split)
> + *mid_split = mab_no_null_split(bn, *mid_split, slot_count);
The function is written this way because mid_split is almost always
zero. If you want to change this, then we should add an unlikely() to
the if statement.
>
> return split;
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists