linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 07/21] dt-bindings: msm: dsi-controller-main: Fix clock declarations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <167155496351.726025.910828492116114621.robh@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:49:38 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Cc:     daniel@...ll.ch, agross@...nel.org, david@...t.cz,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, swboyd@...omium.org,
        quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com, andersson@...nel.org, airlied@...il.com,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        robdclark@...il.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org,
        dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, dianders@...omium.org, sean@...rly.run
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/21] dt-bindings: msm: dsi-controller-main: Fix
 clock declarations


On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 12:36:20 +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> When converting from .txt to .yaml dt-binding descriptions we appear to
> have missed some of the previous detail on the number and names of
> permissible clocks.
> 
> Fix this by listing the clock descriptions against the clock names at a
> high level.
> 
> Fixes: 4dbe55c97741 ("dt-bindings: msm: dsi: add yaml schemas for DSI bindings")
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
> ---
>  .../display/msm/dsi-controller-main.yaml      | 20 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 


Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Missing tags:

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>