[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7452b29-8e9e-a3e2-a870-2c251e48507d@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 09:32:59 -0800
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@....com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"paulmck@...nel.org" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"quic_neeraju@...cinc.com" <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
"rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com" <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
"songmuchun@...edance.com" <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"jpoimboe@...nel.org" <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"chang.seok.bae@...el.com" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
"pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com"
<pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
"jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>,
"daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com" <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
"Das1, Sandipan" <Sandipan.Das@....com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"bagasdotme@...il.com" <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>,
"christophe.leroy@...roup.eu" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>,
"adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"quic_jiles@...cinc.com" <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
"peternewman@...gle.com" <peternewman@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/13] x86/resctrl: Add sysfs interface to write
mbm_total_bytes_config
Hi Babu,
On 12/19/2022 11:50 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
>
> Forgot about this. This snippet is going to change. I have tested and works fine.
> How about this?
>
> /*
> * Update MSR_IA32_EVT_CFG_BASE MSR on one of the CPUs in the
> * domain. The MSRs offset from MSR MSR_IA32_EVT_CFG_BASE
> * are scoped at the domain level. Writing any of these MSRs
> * on one CPU is supposed to be observed by all CPUs in the domain.
> */
> smp_call_function_any(&d->cpu_mask, mon_event_config_write, &mon_info, 1);
>
>
It looks good but please drop the "supposed to be". If there is any uncertainty
then the data should be written to all CPUs, if not then that uncertain text should
be dropped.
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists