[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y6H/PLIxpZmNUaOS@google.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:30:20 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] gpiolib: of: remove [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node()
APIs
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 04:01:08PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 11:20:16AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Now that everyone is using [devm_]fwnode_gpiod_get[_index]() APIs,
> > remove OF-specific [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node().
>
> I very much in favour of this change!
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>
> But the same question reminds, how this is possible to exists with the removed
> of_get_named_gpiod_flags()?
As I mentioned in the other email of_get_named_gpiod_flags() is still
present, it is of_get_named_gpio_flags (without the "d") that was
removed.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists