linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] gpiolib: of: remove [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:30:20 -0800
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] gpiolib: of: remove [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node()
 APIs

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 04:01:08PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 11:20:16AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Now that everyone is using [devm_]fwnode_gpiod_get[_index]() APIs,
> > remove OF-specific [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node().
> 
> I very much in favour of this change!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> But the same question reminds, how this is possible to exists with the removed
> of_get_named_gpiod_flags()?

As I mentioned in the other email of_get_named_gpiod_flags() is still
present, it is of_get_named_gpio_flags (without the "d") that was
removed.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry