[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1e9ca71-f1e8-69fa-c0af-9557484144ec@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 12:58:19 -0600
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"paulmck@...nel.org" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"quic_neeraju@...cinc.com" <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
"rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com" <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
"songmuchun@...edance.com" <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"jpoimboe@...nel.org" <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"chang.seok.bae@...el.com" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
"pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com"
<pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
"jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>,
"daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com" <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
"Das1, Sandipan" <Sandipan.Das@....com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"bagasdotme@...il.com" <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>,
"christophe.leroy@...roup.eu" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>,
"adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"quic_jiles@...cinc.com" <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
"peternewman@...gle.com" <peternewman@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/13] x86/resctrl: Add sysfs interface to write
mbm_total_bytes_config
Hi Reinette,
On 12/20/22 11:32, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 12/19/2022 11:28 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
>> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
>>
>> Hi Reinette,
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2022 12:25 PM
>>> To: Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@....com>; corbet@....net;
>>> tglx@...utronix.de; mingo@...hat.com; bp@...en8.de
>>> Cc: fenghua.yu@...el.com; dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com; x86@...nel.org;
>>> hpa@...or.com; paulmck@...nel.org; akpm@...ux-foundation.org;
>>> quic_neeraju@...cinc.com; rdunlap@...radead.org;
>>> damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com; songmuchun@...edance.com;
>>> peterz@...radead.org; jpoimboe@...nel.org; pbonzini@...hat.com;
>>> chang.seok.bae@...el.com; pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com;
>>> jmattson@...gle.com; daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com; Das1, Sandipan
>>> <Sandipan.Das@....com>; tony.luck@...el.com; james.morse@....com;
>>> linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>>> bagasdotme@...il.com; eranian@...gle.com; christophe.leroy@...roup.eu;
>>> jarkko@...nel.org; adrian.hunter@...el.com; quic_jiles@...cinc.com;
>>> peternewman@...gle.com
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/13] x86/resctrl: Add sysfs interface to write
>>> mbm_total_bytes_config
>>>
>>> Hi Babu,
>>>
>>> On 12/1/2022 7:37 AM, Babu Moger wrote:
> ...
>
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * When an Event Configuration is changed, the bandwidth counters
>>>> + * for all RMIDs and Events will be cleared by the hardware. The
>>>> + * hardware also sets MSR_IA32_QM_CTR.Unavailable (bit 62) for
>>>> + * every RMID on the next read to any event for every RMID.
>>>> + * Subsequent reads will have MSR_IA32_QM_CTR.Unavailable (bit 62)
>>>> + * cleared while it is tracked by the hardware. Clear the
>>>> + * mbm_local and mbm_total counts for all the RMIDs.
>>>> + */
>>>> + resctrl_arch_reset_rmid_all(r, d);
>>> If I understand correctly the expectation is that when user space read counters
>>> (via mon_data files) right after the configuration was changed then this read
>>> will return "Unavailable" and then the next read will return data.
>>>
>>> If this is the case then I think a snippet about this user experience would be
>>> helpful to add to the documentation.
>> Ok. How about this in the documentation?
>>
>> "When an event configuration is changed, the bandwidth counters for all the RMIDs and the events will be cleared for that domain.
>> The next read for every RMID will report "Unavailable" and subsequent reads will report the valid value."
>>
>>
> Thinking about this more ... why are the counters for all eventids cleared
> when only one eventid's configuration is changed?
Its because of the way U-Bit tracking is implemented. The U-bit is tracked
per RMID basis, not on a Per-Event + Per RMID basis. Therefore, resetting
the U-Bit for 1 will reset it for both.
This is what I got from h/w team.
Thanks
Babu
>
> Reinette
>
>
--
Thanks
Babu Moger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists