linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs, nvme: add a feature and quirk policy document

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Dec 2022 09:34:50 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, axboe@...a.com, sagi@...mberg.me,
        kbusch@...nel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs, nvme: add a feature and quirk policy document

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 02:26:22PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 06:08:44AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > The document looks fine, but I do wonder if it wouldn't be better placed
> > with the other maintainer entries in Documentation/maintainer?
> 
> Hmm, nothing in there looks very similar to me, while process
> seems to have real policy documents.  But we can live with either
> place.

Any strong arguments for moving it Documentation/maintainer?

I'd like to merge this with the fixups from Randy through the nvme
tree ASAP, and need to decide on the location.