Message-ID: <CAEf4BzbY8SDL04W_3Vot6iiYu69Lqg9W9aMCp26+RwLBh6C_0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:30:43 -0800
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     sdf@...gle.com
Cc:     Hao Sun <sunhao.th@...il.com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING in __mark_chain_precision

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 11:13 AM <sdf@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/19, Hao Sun wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > The following backtracking bug can be triggered on the latest bpf-next and
> > Linux 6.1 with the C prog provided. I don't have enough knowledge about
> > this part in the verifier, don't know how to fix this.
>
> Maybe something related to commit be2ef8161572 ("bpf: allow precision
> tracking
> for programs with subprogs") and/or the related ones?
>
>
> > This can be reproduced on:
>
> > HEAD commit: 0e43662e61f2 tools/resolve_btfids: Use pkg-config to locate
> > libelf
> > git tree: bpf-next
> > console log: https://pastebin.com/raw/45hZ7iqm
> > kernel config: https://pastebin.com/raw/0pu1CHRm
> > C reproducer: https://pastebin.com/raw/tqsiezvT
>
> > func#0 @0
> > 0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
> > 0: (18) r2 = 0x8000000000000          ; R2_w=2251799813685248
> > 2: (18) r6 = 0xffff888027358000       ;
> > R6_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=3032,vs=3664,imm=0)
> > 4: (18) r7 = 0xffff88802735a000       ;
> > R7_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=156,vs=2624,imm=0)
> > 6: (18) r8 = 0xffff88802735e000       ;
> > R8_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=2396,vs=76,imm=0)
> > 8: (18) r9 = 0x8e9700000000           ; R9_w=156779191205888
> > 10: (36) if w9 >= 0xffffffe3 goto pc+1
> > last_idx 10 first_idx 0
> > regs=200 stack=0 before 8: (18) r9 = 0x8e9700000000
> > 11: R9_w=156779191205888
> > 11: (85) call #0
> > 12: (cc) w2 s>>= w7

w2 should have been set to NOT_INIT (because r1-r5 are clobbered by
calls) and rejected here as !read_ok (see check_reg_arg()) before
attempting to mark precision for r2. Can you please try to debug and
understand why that didn't happen here?


> > last_idx 12 first_idx 12
> > parent didn't have regs=4 stack=0 marks: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0)
> > R2_rw=P2251799813685248 R6_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=3032,vs=3664,imm=0)
> > R7_rw=map_ptr(off=0,ks=156,vs=2624,imm=0)
> > R8_w=map_ptr(off=0,ks=2396,vs=76,imm=0) R9_w=156779191205888 R10=fp0
> > last_idx 11 first_idx 0
> > regs=4 stack=0 before 11: (85) call #0
> > BUG regs 4
> > processed 8 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 1
> > peak_states 1 mark_read 1
>
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > verifier backtracking bug
> > WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 8646 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2756 backtrack_insn
> > kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2756 [inline]
> > WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 8646 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2756
> > __mark_chain_precision+0x1baf/0x1d70 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3065
> > Modules linked in:
> > CPU: 6 PID: 8646 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.1.0-09634-g0e43662e61f2 #146
> > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux
> > 1.16.1-1-1 04/01/2014
> > RIP: 0010:backtrack_insn kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2756 [inline]
> > RIP: 0010:__mark_chain_precision+0x1baf/0x1d70 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3065
> > Code: 0d 31 ff 89 de e8 91 ec ed ff 84 db 0f 85 ef fe ff ff e8 b4 f0
> > ed ff 48 c7 c7 e0 8f 53 8a c6 05 28 71 ab 0d 01 e8 83 b3 1e 08 <0f> 0b
> > e9 50 f8 ff ff 48 8b 74 24 38 48 c7 c7 80 d0 63 8d e8 49 46
> > RSP: 0018:ffffc9001463f1a0 EFLAGS: 00010282
> > RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
> > RDX: ffff888020470000 RSI: ffffffff816662c0 RDI: fffff520028c7e26
> > RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000000
> > R10: 0000000080000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000020
> > R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 000000000000000b R15: ffff88802be74000
> > FS: 00007fd3daeb8440(0000) GS:ffff888063980000(0000)
> > knlGS:0000000000000000
> > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > CR2: 0000000020000240 CR3: 0000000017394000 CR4: 0000000000750ee0
> > PKRU: 55555554
> > Call Trace:
> > <TASK>
> > mark_chain_precision kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3165 [inline]
> > adjust_reg_min_max_vals+0x981/0x58d0 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10715
> > check_alu_op+0x380/0x1820 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10928
> > do_check kernel/bpf/verifier.c:13821 [inline]
> > do_check_common+0x1c3b/0xe520 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:16289
> > do_check_main kernel/bpf/verifier.c:16352 [inline]
> > bpf_check+0x83b4/0xb310 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:16936
> > bpf_prog_load+0xf7a/0x21a0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:2619
> > __sys_bpf+0xf03/0x5840 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4979
> > __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5083 [inline]
> > __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5081 [inline]
> > __x64_sys_bpf+0x78/0xc0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5081
> > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> > do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> > RIP: 0033:0x7fd3da8e4469
> > Code: 00 f3 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48
> > 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d
> > 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d ff 49 2b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> > RSP: 002b:00007fff090c1a78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
> > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fd3da8e4469
> > RDX: 0000000000000080 RSI: 0000000020000840 RDI: 0000000000000005
> > RBP: 00007fff090c2a90 R08: 00007fd3da92e160 R09: 0000000000000000
> > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000561aefc006c0
> > R13: 00007fff090c2b70 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> > </TASK>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists