[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ea3d941-e68a-ce48-5f34-264f925c4358@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:34:05 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Chun-Jie Chen <chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@...omium.org>
Cc: Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: Add missing
power-domains property
Il 21/12/22 11:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
> On 21/12/2022 11:22, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 21/12/22 04:44, Allen-KH Cheng ha scritto:
>>> The "mediatek,mt8192-scp_adsp" binding requires a power domain to be
>>> specified.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 4a803990aeb1 ("dt-bindings: ARM: Mediatek: Add new document bindings of MT8192 clock")
>>> Signed-off-by: Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../arm/mediatek/mediatek,mt8192-clock.yaml | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mt8192-clock.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mt8192-clock.yaml
>>> index b57cc2e69efb..ce8dd2bfb533 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mt8192-clock.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mt8192-clock.yaml
>>> @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ properties:
>>> reg:
>>> maxItems: 1
>>>
>>> + power-domains:
>>> + maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> '#clock-cells':
>>> const: 1
>>>
>>> @@ -47,13 +50,27 @@ required:
>>> - compatible
>>> - reg
>>>
>>> +allOf:
>>
>> allOf is unnecessary here.
>
> If you mean that "if:" can be without it, then it is better to have
> allOf. It grows often, so you avoid useless indentation change later.
>
>
Yes, that's what I mean. I've suggested so because I don't expect this list
to grow in the future.
Regards,
Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists