[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+pv=HMJ1K5Hhho7FgsGEf=7i2ZROT6y8X9Q6m1LXSyxj9h4Qw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 20:15:27 -0500
From: Slade Watkins <srw@...dewatkins.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/18] 5.10.161-rc1 review
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 5:36 PM Slade Watkins <srw@...dewatkins.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 2:28 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release.
> > There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Hi,
I noticed that the original message was missing my Tested-by...
> Compiled and tested on my x86_64 test systems, no errors or
> regressions to report.
Same applies.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins <srw@...dewatkins.net>
Sorry,
-- Slade
(via his corrected script)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists