linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Trivial set of FIPS 140-3 related changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y6NwqFQqlszdheYZ@sol.localdomain>
Date:   Wed, 21 Dec 2022 12:46:32 -0800
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     Vladis Dronov <vdronov@...hat.com>
Cc:     nstange@...e.de, davem@...emloft.net, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        smueller@...onox.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Trivial set of FIPS 140-3 related changes

On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 04:24:00PM +0100, Vladis Dronov wrote:
> Hi Nicolai, Robert, Herbert, all,
> 
> I would like to revive this older upstream email thread. I would like
> to address notes from reviewers (namely, Robert) by additional patches
> so the whole patchset can be accepted. This should ease our future
> kernel work re: FIPS.
> 
> The below 2 patches address (I hope) both notes Robert and Herbert have
> provided (thanks!). I hope the whole patchset can be accepted then.
> 
> Logically my 2 patches should follow [PATCH 1/4] and be patches 2 and 3.
> Herbert is it possible to reorder them when accepting?
> 
> Thank you! and
> 
> Best regards,
> Vladis

Please just resend the whole series, with the --base option to git format-patch
used, so that reviewers don't have to try to piece it together.

- Eric