[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a251f29d-58b7-5ccb-2661-a397e41fba80@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 10:29:40 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
Lux Aliaga <they@...t.lgbt>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Document smmu-500 binding
for SM6125
On 22/12/2022 09:23, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2022-12-20 10:52:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 19/12/2022 20:28, Marijn Suijten wrote:
>>> On 2022-12-19 10:09:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 19/12/2022 10:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 16/12/2022 22:58, Marijn Suijten wrote:
>>>>>> From: Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Document smmu-500 compatibility with the SM6125 SoC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>>>
>>>> Wait, not entirely... no constraints for clocks and regs?
>>>
>>> Quite odd that there is no warning for my DT patch as it clearly
>>> requires at least one clock...
>
> Again, any idea why there's no warning for this DT mismatching minItems:
> 1 for clocks, clock-names and power-domains?
I don't know what do you have in DT and what is mismatched. Why there
should be a warning?
>
>>> Irrespective of that downstream doesn't define any (nor power domains).
>>> How should we proceed?
>>
>> Binding now has constraints for clocks so at least that should be added
>> to your variant.
>
> And that should be:
>
> clock-names: false
> clocks: false
> power-domains: false
>
> Because this board does declare have any, at least not when going off of
> downstream DT?
I'll add it for existing platforms, so you can rebase on top.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists